On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote: > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Instruments generally, nowhere. Proposals in particular, the first > > paragraph of R106: > > > > When a proposal that includes > > such explicit changes takes effect, it applies those changes to > > the gamestate. > > Huh. I'm not convinced that proposal power isn't still broken-- this > sentence takes precedence over Power Controls Mutability.
Huh indeed. In particular, it's not the definition of "security" that matters, but the fact that this overrules most Rule statements that say Specific Quantity X is Secured. -G.
