On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 10:49 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > I believe that argument is only valid within a certain scope. In > particular, consider it in conjunction with G.'s gratuitous arguments > in the same case; there was certainly reasonable opportunity to review > the possibility of a loophole in the various without-objection methods, > but I don't think there was reasonable opportunity to review the > possibility of declaring with-notice after the fact.
There was a 4-day window, after I had specifically said that there was a scam. How is that not an opportunity? -- ais523
