On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 06:51 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, ais523 wrote: > > First, we have to deal with a potential bug in the proposal itself; it > > attempts to create a rule, but does not specify its power. However, it > > seems reasonable to assume that the rule is created at power 1; although > > nowhere in the rules is a default power implied for rules, > > It's in R105(a) first sentence. -G.
Good catch, I had a sneaking suspicion that rule was there somewhere and I'd just missed it. It doesn't affect the judgement, though. -- ais523
