On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:28, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > 2721: GUILTY / APOLOGY > 2722: GUILTY / DISCHARGE > 2723: GUILTY / DISCHARGE > > Technically GUILTY, but for the various reasons cited, an APOLOGY > should be sufficient - provided that it isn't phoned in this time. > > For today's prescribed-words list, we go to Urban Dictionary for > some noun phrases: > > different hats > roll call > bedding the rules > objectively attractive > Not that I think you've been unfair, but did you consider my argument for NOT GUILTY via implicit announcement? The NOVs were announced in the Insulator report, and by assigning them ID numbers I implicitly declared their validity. I think this does satisfy the requirement in the rules.
BobTHJ
