On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, comex wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> There's also a secondary misleading (meta-misleading) to consider: did >> someone mislead us to think that an error that was put in on purpose >> was accidental? > > No, because the 50 + 50i errors were obviously put in on purpose, > which is how the report avoids misleading us as to its truth value.
Oh I give up. If you want a game where officers can purposefully post incorrect information with impunity, you can have it.
