On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > There was no intent to mislead as to the truth of the claim here; the > intent was that the claim would be questioned and ultimately denied. > It did not matter to the scam whether anyone actually believed the > claim was true.
It doesn't matter whether you wanted people to be misled. coppro intentionally published a false statement, and there is no evidence e was unaware that it would mislead people. Compare my scam distribution and the statement about the empty proposal pool, which I would surely have been convicted for had I sent the distribution knowing it would contain that statement.
