On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, comex wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> There's also a secondary misleading (meta-misleading) to consider: did >>> someone mislead us to think that an error that was put in on purpose >>> was accidental? >> >> No, because the 50 + 50i errors were obviously put in on purpose, >> which is how the report avoids misleading us as to its truth value. > > Oh I give up. If you want a game where officers can purposefully > post incorrect information with impunity, you can have it. >
Due to a bug the section of the rules forbidding it had been removed. It has since been reinstated.
