On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Evidence:  I was misled.  When I first saw that Scorekeepor's Report, my
> first thought was "what the heck did they do to earn that many points?".
Well, I tried to make it as obviously suspicious as possible.  That's
why we both had *exactly* 50+50i, and why the report was titled
"Totally Correct Scoreboard" instead of just the usual "Scoreboard".

-root

Reply via email to