On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > Evidence: I was misled. When I first saw that Scorekeepor's Report, my > first thought was "what the heck did they do to earn that many points?".
Well, I tried to make it as obviously suspicious as possible. That's why we both had *exactly* 50+50i, and why the report was titled "Totally Correct Scoreboard" instead of just the usual "Scoreboard". -root