On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> Evidence: I was misled. When I first saw that Scorekeepor's Report, my >> first thought was "what the heck did they do to earn that many points?". > > Well, I tried to make it as obviously suspicious as possible. That's > why we both had *exactly* 50+50i, and why the report was titled > "Totally Correct Scoreboard" instead of just the usual "Scoreboard". > > -root >
Though in agora, totally correct can mean incorrect, it is only suspicious. I'm used to unfounded suspicion in agora.