On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, comex wrote: > On Sep 26, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well you did come forward a week later but I'm wondering as to your >> purpose, were you exploring a bug in the self-ratification-of-identity >> rule? (I can't remember what you said when you originally told us about >> it). It's turned into an interesting discussion in any case. -Goethe > > E was attempting to create a brand new first-class person under eir control...
My question was why did e come forward when e didn't have to? Even if the scam had worked, once we know about it we could just boot that "first-class" zombie out by proposal. By coming forward, e gave us a scam that showed that self-ratification-of-identity is broken in some way maybe, and at most gave emself a "zombie" for a few weeks. By keeping quiet e could have caused another Annabel-level crisis. (E didn't propose a fix emself, so I'm not excusing it here, just exploring mitigating circumstances). -G.
