On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 22:37, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2008 08:20:35 am Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> I recommend a sentence of >> EXILE with a tariff of 180 days. > > R1504 prescribes "the middle of the tariff range... for severe rule > breaches amounting to a breach of trust." The middle of the tariff > range in this case is 90 days. Is what e did really *significantly > more* severe than a "severe rule breach[] amounting to a breach of > trust"?
Well, from the rest of Wooble's words: > [...] Since he > first came across Agora, e's constantly shown a blatant disregard for > the rules, and unlike many other scamsters has taken on little > responsibility as a mitigating factor. I take it that e alleges that tusho's history makes a longer tariff warranted compared to some isolated violation that nevertheless amounted to a severe breach of trust. Whether this is a good argument, any judge assigning a sentence will need to determine. -woggle
