On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Ben Caplan wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2008 08:20:35 am Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> I recommend a sentence of >> EXILE with a tariff of 180 days. > > R1504 prescribes "the middle of the tariff range... for severe rule > breaches amounting to a breach of trust." The middle of the tariff > range in this case is 90 days. Is what e did really *significantly > more* severe than a "severe rule breach[] amounting to a breach of > trust"?
Not only did e try this before, but e was specifically warned that it was a breach of trust, the severity of it was pointed out, and the Rules were changed as a result to amplify that this was a breach of trust. This was done knowingly, willingly, and directly, and with what should have been a strong understanding of its severity. Still, I would say that 90 days would be sufficient, though frankly I have no faith that e wouldn't just show up again under another guise. -Goethe
