On 5/19/08, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Judges don't get salaries of some kind anymore? I haven't been keeping
> track personally, I just assumed we still got notes or something. I
> agree (also to your point on tardiness) that salaries would be motivating
> to many.
In fact, I was wrong, there are salaries:
(3) (D) At the end of each week, each player who published at
least one on-time judgement during that week gains a D
Note.
although I swear that wasn't there the last time I read the rule. But
it doesn't account for appeals, and Notes are a fairly weak currency
anyway, being impossible to lose and hard to spend.
But of course I'm a miser of Notes, just like I was of VCs. ;)
> > Which reminds me of an idea I had... what if we made Contracts a
> > subtype of Rules which might not apply to all persons? If done right,
> > contests like the AAA could create (say) Agoran decisions without
> > either any specific wording to that effect or any chance of scamming
> > the Agoran decision rule, because the contest would be defining
> > decisions at its own power. It's relevant to this discussion because
> > we could also "promote" the AAA to rule status easily, if we liked it
> > enough, then reference it in other rules.
>
> Isn't that possible now?
Not really. Even the contracts that define dependent actions aren't
really allowed to (Rule 1728: "the Rules explicitly authorize...").
