comex wrote:
> By the way, the above is another reason why R101 should not be
> interpreted such that I am guilty. If I wanted to break a rule and
> get away with it, with this interpretation, I need only break the rule
> then immediately initiate a criminal case against myself claiming that
> I violated some other random rule with my action. I would be
> UNIMPUGNED and nobody could initiate a criminal case for the real
> violation.
False. R1504:
* ALREADY TRIED, appropriate if judgement has already been
reached in another criminal case with the same defendant, the
same rule, and substantially the same alleged act ^^^
^^^^^^^^^
