On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comex wrote: > >> Not really. Even the contracts that define dependent actions aren't >> really allowed to (Rule 1728: "the Rules explicitly authorize..."). > > I think this is covered by the first paragraph of Rule 2198: > > If a contract specifies a mechanism by which Contract Changes to > it can be performed, then such changes CAN be performed using > that mechanism.
Hmm... What about a contract that states that its mechanism for being terminated is an Announcement of Chaos, which destroys all rules and then terminates the contract?
