On Thu, 15 May 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2008, comex wrote: >> Exactly! ALREADY TRIED, the explicit mechanism for dealing with dupe >> trials, requires it to be the same rule or it doesn't count. > > That doesn't change my argument. R101 would have precedence and prevent > the trial altogether. It's not implicit, it's explicit.
Sorry, I didn't mean "prevent" the trial, I meant make it illegal to start the second one, as doing so abridges/limits etc. my rights. -Goethe
