So if Elon Musk isn’t in charge of DOGE, who is?  Maybe Floki.

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1625695877326340102

 

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 6:30 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DOGE website (www.doge.gov)

 

doge.gov <http://doge.gov>  requires zero membership fee, spit out your koolaid

 

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 5:25 PM Jan-GAMs <j.vank...@grnacres.net 
<mailto:j.vank...@grnacres.net> > wrote:

It being on X is not publicly available.  You have to be a member.  Are you 
saying they take your private information and deduct member fees from your 
social security check and make you a member against your will?

On 2/17/25 06:00, Steve Jones wrote:

A better question is why do we have to take their word for it when it's spent? 

The good, final outcome of this is there is a framework in place now for all 
future spending to be on public record in a clear and transparent manner, 
publicly accessible, with the spend requests and links to the outcome reports. 
That should t require foia

 

My guess is half of what they claw back will ultimately be paid out when it's 
explained and justified.

 

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 7:23 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com 
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Steve, 

 

An example I just saw on doge.gov <http://doge.gov>  was an $8mil USDA contract 
with a screen shot of a record.  Nothing on the screen demonstrates how it was 
waste, fraud, or abuse.  The title of the contract was some fluffy sounding 
thing about environmental compliance, and as far as I can tell the title is 
what we’re supposed to accept as evidence.  That was an example from the day’s 
“batch” with no information provided about whatever else was canceled that day.

 

Maybe they’ll publish more details later for “maximal transparency”, but right 
now we are forced to take their word for it.  

 

It’s fair to have a problem with unelected bureaucrats wielding most of the 
power of the federal government, but the same should not become OK just because 
the bureaucrat is an ideologically appropriate apparatchik.  

 

 

 

Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> 

  _____  

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> > on behalf 
of Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2025 9:41:06 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DOGE website (www.doge.gov <http://www.doge.gov> ) 

 

yeah, super scary. boogeyman level

 

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025, 6:17 PM Jason McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com 
<mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> > wrote:

This seems about par for the course with these guys.  Scary stuff. 

 

I love how this administration uses the term "maximally transparent", or some 
derivation thereof everywhere they can.  I guess if you say it enough, it must 
be true, right?

 

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 5:59 PM Ken Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com 
<mailto:khoh...@kwom.com> > wrote:

https://www.wired.com/story/doge-website-is-just-one-big-x-ad/

 

DOGE’s Website Is Just One Big X Ad

The source code for the new Department of Government Efficiency’s “official US 
government website” points to X as its primary source of authority, while 
sharing links to the site sends users to x.com <http://x.com> .

 

At a press conference in the Oval Office 
<https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/12/tech/elon-musk-x-oval-office/index.html>  
this week, Elon Musk promised the actions of his so-called Department of 
Government Efficiency (DOGE) <https://www.wired.com/tag/doge/>  project would 
be “maximally transparent,” thanks to information posted to its website.

At the time of his comment, the DOGE website was empty 
<https://bsky.app/profile/joncooper-us.bsky.social/post/3lhwsmk4iac2u> . 
However, when the site finally came online Thursday morning, it turned out to 
be little more than a glorified feed of posts from the official DOGE account on 
Musk’s own X platform, raising new questions about Musk’s conflicts of interest 
in running DOGE 
<https://www.npr.org/2025/02/12/nx-s1-5293382/x-elon-musk-doge-cfpb> .

DOGE.gov claims to be an “official website of the United States government,” 
but rather than giving detailed breakdowns of the cost savings and efficiencies 
Musk claims his project is making, the homepage of the site just replicated 
posts from the DOGE account on X.

A WIRED review of the page’s source code shows that the promotion of Musk’s own 
platform went deeper than replicating the posts on the homepage. The source 
code shows that the site’s canonical tags 
<https://moz.com/learn/seo/canonicalization>  direct search engines to x.com 
<http://x.com>  rather than DOGE.gov.

A canonical tag is a snippet of code that tells search engines what the 
authoritative version of a website is. It is typically used by sites with 
multiple pages as a search engine optimization tactic, to avoid their search 
ranking being diluted.

In DOGE’s case, however, the code is informing search engines that when people 
search for content found on DOGE.gov, they should not show those pages in 
search results, but should instead display the posts on X.

“It is promoting the X account as the main source, with the website secondary,” 
Declan Chidlow, a web developer <https://vale.rocks/> , tells WIRED. “This 
isn't usually how things are handled, and it indicates that the X account is 
taking priority over the actual website itself.”

Advertisement

All the other US government websites WIRED checked used their own homepage in 
their canonical tags, including the official White House website. Additionally, 
when sharing the DOGE website on mobile devices, the source code creates a link 
to the DOGE X account rather than the website itself.

“It seems that the DOGE website is secondary, and they are prodding people in 
the direction of the X account everywhere they can,” Chidlow adds.

Alongside the homepage feed of X posts, a section of Doge.gov labeled “Savings” 
now appears. So far the page is empty except for a single line that reads: 
“Receipts coming soon, no later than Valentine's day,” followed by a heart 
emoji <https://www.wired.com/story/heart-emoji-lost-all-meaning/> .

A section entitled “Workforce” features some bar charts showing how many people 
work in each government agency, with the information coming from data gathered 
by the Office of Personnel Management in March 2024.

A disclaimer at the bottom of the page reads: “This is DOGE's effort to create 
a comprehensive, government-wide org chart. This is an enormous effort, and 
there are likely some errors or omissions. We will continue to strive for 
maximum accuracy over time.”

Another section, entitled “Regulations,” features what DOGE calls the 
“Unconstitutionality Index,” which it describes as “the number of agency rules 
created by unelected bureaucrats for each law passed by Congress in 2024.”

The charts in this section are also based on data previously collected by US 
government agencies. Doge.gov also links to a Forbes article from last month 
that was written by Clyde Wayne Crews, a member of the Heartland Institute, a 
conservative think tank that pushed climate change disinformation 
<https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/heartland-institute-leak-exposes-strategies-of-climate-attack-machine/>
  and questioned the links between tobacco and lung cancer 
<https://www.tobaccotactics.org/article/heartland-institute/> . It is also a 
major advocate for privatizing government departments 
<https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/in-shift-key-climate-denialist-group-heartland-institute-pivots-to-policy/>
 .

The site also features a “Join” page which allows prospective DOGE employees to 
apply for roles including “software engineers, InfoSec engineers, and other 
technology professionals.” As well as requesting a Github account and résumé, 
the form asks visitors to “provide 2-3 bullet points showcasing exceptional 
ability.”

The website does not list a developer, but on Wednesday, web application 
security expert Sam Curry outlined in a thread on X 
<https://x.com/samwcyo/status/1889527715029557607>  how he was able to identify 
the developer of the site as DOGE employee Kyle Shutt.

Curry claims he was able to link a Cloudflare account ID found in the site’s 
source code to Shutt, who used the same account when developing Musk’s America 
PAC 
<https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-america-pac-election-denial-community-x/>
  website.

On Thursday, Drop Site News 
<https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/doge-fema-funding-access-social-security-numbers>
  reported, citing sources within FEMA, that Shutt had gained access to the 
agency’s proprietary software controlling payments. Earlier this week, Business 
Insider reported 
<https://www.businessinsider.com/doge-staff-list-white-house-2025-2>  that 
Shutt, who recently worked at an AI interviewing software company, was listed 
as one of 30 people working for DOGE.

Neither Shutt, DOGE, nor the White House responded to requests for comment.

 

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

 

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to