"Concealing a relatives death"  Exactly what I was saying...   nothing went to shit.   You were the one that named them Mike....

thanks for the proof of MY point...  But keep drinking

Mike the methhead is a woman, fyi https://oig.ssa.gov/neealing ws-releases/2023-01-25-caseyville-woman-admits-to-cashing-deceased-mother%E2%80%99s-social-security-checks/ <https://oig.ssa.gov/news-releases/2023-01-25-caseyville-woman-admits-to-cashing-deceased-mother%E2%80%99s-social-security-checks/>

but ssa oig is lying too? preemptively? do you see how many parts of your diatribe went to shit in one article.




On Wed, Feb 19, 2025, 10:26 PM ch...@go-mtc.com <ch...@go-mtc.com> wrote:

    It's gonna be a fun show to watch.  I don't believe the sky is
    falling.  Liberal heads are exploding and that is amusing to me. 
    Trump has done some puzzling things, but I hope there is a weird
    tactic of some sort behind them and not just demented megalomaniac
    weirdness.    But hey, they got more hostages released today and
    they found an entire bureaucracy in some stone tunnel that process
    government retirement benefits by hand using paper and manilla
    envelopes.  That alone is a big win in my book.  Can you believe
    that...  I presume it is true.

    And I really loved the "throwing gold bars off the Titanic"
    recording....  You just can't make some of this stuff up.

    Both Musk and Trump are way too quick to repeat dumb-ass things
    from their unadvised advisors at times.  Remember the inject
    bleach press conference...

    I am just having fun sitting back watching the big show. It is all
    pro wrestling to me.

    I am hoping that he will bend Zelinski's arm enough to give up
    enough turf to get Putin to leave town.  That would be a win.  I
    am hoping Trump convinces the NATO nations that he really might
    back out or stop paying.  I think he has Europe's attention now
    that they cannot count on the USA.  That is not a bad thing.  Why
    should we borrow money to pay more for our fair share?  In that
    theme why should we borrow money to buy condoms for folks in
    Afghanistan or wherever.   We are not the nursing mother of the
    planet.  Let's get homeless veterans a hotel room in Manhattan,
    not foreign nationals that show up expecting a handout.  I had to
    drive clear out on Long Island to find a room during a weather
    delay the last time I came through JFK.  All the local hotels were
    full up with migrants/immigrants/illegals/refuges/criminals
    whatever you choose to call them.  But they had a nice warm cot
    and three hots a day in a 4 star Manhattan hotel courtesy of our
    limitless visa card.

    No nukes launched yet so all is well!



    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on behalf of Robert
    <i...@avantwireless.com>
    *Sent:* Wednesday, February 19, 2025 7:13 PM
    *To:* af@af.afmug.com <af@af.afmug.com>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DOGE website (www.doge.gov
    <http://www.doge.gov>)
    I had no idea that Steve has so much inside information that is so
    well documented.  Because HE THINKS SOMETHING it MUST be true.


    Steve you are the one drinking the kool-aide by the gallon.

    Yes it is complicated to put and pull money from dead peoples
    accounts.  My step daughters had to jump though mega hoops to get
    access to their deceased fathers' accounts.

    Digital age does not mean trivial ways to get around bank account
    access control.

     Yes the SSA did spit out age reports.  Just because they knew not
    to populate it with bad data doesn't mean it's not a valid report.

    Musk's team didn't know about Cobol data formats until someone
    shoved under their noses.

    Mike the methhead didn't report gammy's death, that's how he kept
    cashing the checks.  He put her in a freezer until social services
    showed up.   Oh now there aren't those social services to find out
    grammy's dead, so the now it's going to get worse not better.

    Hell the right will love it, they can now withhold SSI payments if
    you don't go into the voting booth and vote in the King every 4 years.

    Give me a fucking break, EVERYTHING you protest on the left is now
    happening for reals from the right with a congress that isn't
    doing their principal job which is to act as a check on the other
    leg of government.   I do believe you really do want to live in a
    dictatorship.

    Just remember it's all good that other people are getting shafted
    right up until you find out that you are one of the "Other People"
    Enjoy your $13 dollar cartons of eggs and the 20% gas price
    increases SO FAR...   All my 1% friends are loving the tax cuts
    coming.

    On 2/19/25 5:45 PM, Steve Jones wrote:

        we operate in a digital age so its not complicated to pull
        money from dead peoples accounts or to put it in. Neither of
        my parents have cashed a social security check in a long time.
        I think a ton of its simple human errors, not COBOL date
        limitations. Most of the SSNs probably arent receiving a
        check, but its always been in the millions for fraud with SSI
        but everybody says since its less than 1% its ok (hint, its
        not probably less, and its absolutely not OK)
        Up until a week ago, the SSA couldn't spit out an age report,
        but thats just COBOL, right?

        I would like an accounting of the fraudulent payments that are
        made to show commonality amongst institutions, Im guessing its
        more common amongst certain banking groups than others. Like
        ive said, this is all about big data, thats musk teams
        wheelhouse. Government has always had big data, they just
        didnt have any way to manage it. So we are going from little
        to no oversight or management to big data analytics at warp
        speed. Including death notices to financial institutions. You
        never hear about Mike the Methhead getting busted cashing dead
        grannies SSI checks 3 months after she croaks, its usually
        years/decades before its caught

        With AI driven analytics pattern recognition, fraud detection
        rates will go through the roof, once the data is migrated to
        systems capable. Imagine once the federal systems can all talk
        to each other. Hell, the left will love it, they will be able
        to withhold SSI payments if little johnny crippleton
        isnt marked vaccinated on time.


        I do, on the other hand also suspect we are going to see an
        increase in terrorism. Some of those 200 year olds SSI checks
        may have been funding stuff happenning in places that dont
        exist because the US doesnt do "terrible things" like that.
        Most of those folks probably have names like Clarence Ignatio
        Adams, Charlene Ida Appleton, or Carl Ike ANotthecia

        On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 7:12 PM Adam Moffett
        <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

            Steve,

            What's your take on the claims of tens of millions of dead
            people getting Social Security?

            My first thought was that it would require every bank in
            the country to be collectively processing millions of
            checks every month made out to dead people with none of
            them noticing, so surely nobody is going to believe that. 
            I was disappointed to find out that a lot of people are
            dumb enough to believe that.




            On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 7:31 PM Steve Jones
            <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

                doge.gov <http://doge.gov> requires zero membership
                fee, spit out your koolaid

                On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 5:25 PM Jan-GAMs
                <j.vank...@grnacres.net> wrote:

                    It being on X is not publicly available.  You have
                    to be a member.  Are you saying they take your
                    private information and deduct member fees from
                    your social security check and make you a member
                    against your will?

                    On 2/17/25 06:00, Steve Jones wrote:

                        A better question is why do we have to take
                        their word for it when it's spent?
                        The good, final outcome of this is there is a
                        framework in place now for all future spending
                        to be on public record in a clear and
                        transparent manner, publicly accessible, with
                        the spend requests and links to the outcome
                        reports. That should t require foia

                        My guess is half of what they claw back will
                        ultimately be paid out when it's explained and
                        justified.

                        On Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 7:23 AM Adam Moffett
                        <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

                            Steve,

                            An example I just saw on doge.gov
                            <http://doge.gov> was an $8mil USDA
                            contract with a screen shot of a record. 
                            Nothing on the screen demonstrates how it
                            was waste, fraud, or abuse.  The title of
                            the contract was some fluffy sounding
                            thing about environmental compliance, and
                            as far as I can tell the title is what
                            we’re supposed to accept as evidence. That
                            was an example from the day’s “batch” with
                            no information provided about whatever
                            else was canceled that day.

                            Maybe they’ll publish more details later
                            for “maximal transparency”, but right now
                            we are forced to take their word for it.

                            It’s fair to have a problem with unelected
                            bureaucrats wielding most of the power of
                            the federal government, but the same
                            should not become OK just because the
                            bureaucrat is an ideologically appropriate
                            apparatchik.



                            Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
                            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> on
                            behalf of Steve Jones
                            <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
                            *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2025 9:41:06 PM
                            *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
                            <af@af.afmug.com>
                            *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DOGE website
                            (www.doge.gov <http://www.doge.gov>)
                            yeah, super scary. boogeyman level

                            On Sat, Feb 15, 2025, 6:17 PM Jason
                            McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
                            wrote:

                                This seems about par for the course
                                with these guys.  Scary stuff.

                                I love how this administration uses
                                the term "maximally transparent", or
                                some derivation thereof everywhere
                                they can.  I guess if you say it
                                enough, it must be true, right?

                                On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 5:59 PM Ken
                                Hohhof <khoh...@kwom.com> wrote:

                                    
https://www.wired.com/story/doge-website-is-just-one-big-x-ad/

                                    DOGE’s Website Is Just One Big X Ad

                                    *The source code for the new
                                    Department of Government
                                    Efficiency’s “official US
                                    government website” points to X as
                                    its primary source of authority,
                                    while sharing links to the site
                                    sends users to x.com <http://x.com>.*

                                    At a press conference in the Oval
                                    Office
                                    
<https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/12/tech/elon-musk-x-oval-office/index.html> 
this
                                    week, Elon Musk promised the
                                    actions of his so-called
                                    Department of Government
                                    Efficiency (DOGE)
                                    <https://www.wired.com/tag/doge/> project
                                    would be “maximally transparent,”
                                    thanks to information posted to
                                    its website.

                                    At the time of his comment, the
                                    DOGE website was empty
                                    
<https://bsky.app/profile/joncooper-us.bsky.social/post/3lhwsmk4iac2u>.
                                    However, when the site finally
                                    came online Thursday morning, it
                                    turned out to be little more than
                                    a glorified feed of posts from the
                                    official DOGE account on Musk’s
                                    own X platform, raising new
                                    questions about Musk’s conflicts
                                    of interest in running DOGE
                                    
<https://www.npr.org/2025/02/12/nx-s1-5293382/x-elon-musk-doge-cfpb>.

                                    DOGE.gov claims to be an “official
                                    website of the United States
                                    government,” but rather than
                                    giving detailed breakdowns of the
                                    cost savings and efficiencies Musk
                                    claims his project is making, the
                                    homepage of the site just
                                    replicated posts from the DOGE
                                    account on X.

                                    A WIRED review of the page’s
                                    source code shows that the
                                    promotion of Musk’s own platform
                                    went deeper than replicating the
                                    posts on the homepage. The source
                                    code shows that the site’s
                                    canonical tags
                                    
<https://moz.com/learn/seo/canonicalization> direct
                                    search engines to x.com
                                    <http://x.com> rather than DOGE.gov.

                                    A canonical tag is a snippet of
                                    code that tells search engines
                                    what the authoritative version of
                                    a website is. It is typically used
                                    by sites with multiple pages as a
                                    search engine optimization tactic,
                                    to avoid their search ranking
                                    being diluted.

                                    In DOGE’s case, however, the code
                                    is informing search engines that
                                    when people search for content
                                    found on DOGE.gov, they should not
                                    show those pages in search
                                    results, but should instead
                                    display the posts on X.

                                    “It is promoting the X account as
                                    the main source, with the website
                                    secondary,” Declan Chidlow, a web
                                    developer <https://vale.rocks/>,
                                    tells WIRED. “This isn't usually
                                    how things are handled, and it
                                    indicates that the X account is
                                    taking priority over the actual
                                    website itself.”

                                    Advertisement

                                    All the other US government
                                    websites WIRED checked used their
                                    own homepage in their canonical
                                    tags, including the official White
                                    House website. Additionally, when
                                    sharing the DOGE website on mobile
                                    devices, the source code creates a
                                    link to the DOGE X account rather
                                    than the website itself.

                                    “It seems that the DOGE website is
                                    secondary, and they are prodding
                                    people in the direction of the X
                                    account everywhere they can,”
                                    Chidlow adds.

                                    Alongside the homepage feed of X
                                    posts, a section of Doge.gov
                                    labeled “Savings” now appears. So
                                    far the page is empty except for a
                                    single line that reads: “Receipts
                                    coming soon, no later than
                                    Valentine's day,” followed by a
                                    heart emoji
                                    
<https://www.wired.com/story/heart-emoji-lost-all-meaning/>.

                                    A section entitled “Workforce”
                                    features some bar charts showing
                                    how many people work in each
                                    government agency, with the
                                    information coming from data
                                    gathered by the Office of
                                    Personnel Management in March 2024.

                                    A disclaimer at the bottom of the
                                    page reads: “This is DOGE's effort
                                    to create a comprehensive,
                                    government-wide org chart. This is
                                    an enormous effort, and there are
                                    likely some errors or omissions.
                                    We will continue to strive for
                                    maximum accuracy over time.”

                                    Another section, entitled
                                    “Regulations,” features what DOGE
                                    calls the “Unconstitutionality
                                    Index,” which it describes as “the
                                    number of agency rules created by
                                    unelected bureaucrats for each law
                                    passed by Congress in 2024.”

                                    The charts in this section are
                                    also based on data previously
                                    collected by US government
                                    agencies. Doge.gov also links to a
                                    Forbes article from last month
                                    that was written by Clyde Wayne
                                    Crews, a member of the Heartland
                                    Institute, a conservative think
                                    tank that pushed climate change
                                    disinformation
                                    
<https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/heartland-institute-leak-exposes-strategies-of-climate-attack-machine/>
 and
                                    questioned the links between
                                    tobacco and lung cancer
                                    
<https://www.tobaccotactics.org/article/heartland-institute/>.
                                    It is also a major advocate for
                                    privatizing government departments
                                    
<https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/in-shift-key-climate-denialist-group-heartland-institute-pivots-to-policy/>.

                                    The site also features a “Join”
                                    page which allows prospective DOGE
                                    employees to apply for roles
                                    including “software engineers,
                                    InfoSec engineers, and other
                                    technology professionals.” As well
                                    as requesting a Github account and
                                    résumé, the form asks visitors to
                                    “provide 2-3 bullet points
                                    showcasing exceptional ability.”

                                    The website does not list a
                                    developer, but on Wednesday, web
                                    application security expert Sam
                                    Curry outlined in a thread on X
                                    
<https://x.com/samwcyo/status/1889527715029557607> how
                                    he was able to identify the
                                    developer of the site as DOGE
                                    employee Kyle Shutt.

                                    Curry claims he was able to link a
                                    Cloudflare account ID found in the
                                    site’s source code to Shutt, who
                                    used the same account when
                                    developing Musk’s America PAC
                                    
<https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-america-pac-election-denial-community-x/>
 website.

                                    On Thursday, Drop Site News
                                    
<https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/doge-fema-funding-access-social-security-numbers>
 reported,
                                    citing sources within FEMA, that
                                    Shutt had gained access to the
                                    agency’s proprietary software
                                    controlling payments. Earlier this
                                    week, Business Insider reported
                                    
<https://www.businessinsider.com/doge-staff-list-white-house-2025-2> that
                                    Shutt, who recently worked at an
                                    AI interviewing software company,
                                    was listed as one of 30 people
                                    working for DOGE.

                                    Neither Shutt, DOGE, nor the White
                                    House responded to requests for
                                    comment.

                                    --
                                    AF mailing list
                                    AF@af.afmug.com
                                    
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                                --
                                AF mailing list
                                AF@af.afmug.com
                                
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                            --
                            AF mailing list
                            AF@af.afmug.com
                            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


                    --
                    AF mailing list
                    AF@af.afmug.com
                    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                --
                AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

            --
            AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to