I've only bought two homes, so I may be inexperienced, but I volunteered to purchase bot of them
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020, 1:09 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Nothing voluntary about HOAs. If you buy a home in an HOA area, you are > subject to their tax and there is nothing you can do about it. > > *From:* Steve Jones > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 6, 2020 11:58 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal > > is that a real conspiracy? > > My wife had a friend over the other day, first time I ever met a real Q > believer. weird shit. is Q not the same as Qanon? cause Qanon I always > thought was just some guy that posted vague stuff and was supposedly in the > administration. Q people think the rich eat babies and some lady who just > had a miscarriage, cristy tegan or something, uses the code pizza, for > little girls and always instagrams about pizza. weird shit > > I think HOAs operate on different rules, since its a "voluntary" entry > into them. Ive never looked too deep into it cause id never be in one, id > put an air hose up my back first. but the contracts must give up a great > deal of private property rights including waiving otard stuff > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: > >> Google uses low frequency brain stimulation.. Whenever you use their >> browser and the volume isn't turned off. >> >> On 10/6/20 7:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: >> >> Messaging is king of all I suppose. >> >> If you were Google, people would believe that you magically give it away >> for free. Since you're not Google they'll assume some kind of robbery or >> graft. I don't know how Google pulls off that kind of public relations >> coup. >> >> >> On 10/6/2020 10:06 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: >> >> But it is free! Comes with HOA dues. Such a deal. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >> >> >> If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic. >> >> You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody will buy >> anything else when they're already forced to pay you whether they like it >> or not. They'd have to actively hate you before they'll even consider >> something else. You'd have to steal their birthdays before they consider >> another option, and you'd have to violate their daughters before they're >> willing to pay what the installation of the other option will actually cost. >> >> .....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course. Competitors >> will cry foul because you can make money and they can't, but that doesn't >> mean they wouldn't do the same thing if they could. >> >> >> On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >> >> >> We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service included in HOA fees. >> They can have any service provider they want. >> But the service provider will have to do an overbuild into a saturated >> area. I would bet they will not do it. >> >> *From:* Mark Radabaugh >> *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM >> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal >> >> >> https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/ >> https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566 >> FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February >> ...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts >> <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjak-670p7sAhUVHM0KHcR5D74QFjACegQIBxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hoalawblog.com%2Ffcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts%2F&usg=AOvVaw1IWC6vbyFt33Un5wLgPWSa> >> >> Pay your money and take your chances >> >> Mark >> >> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> Lots of companies doing these deals. MDU, subdivisions. What would be >> illegal about it? The homeowners are free to go after any service they >> want, but they are locked into my service. This has been litigated at the >> CATV level years ago and was found legal. >> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: >> >>> I think you are going to find that arrangement is highly illegal from an >>> FCC standpoint. When the deal gets blown out by the next company that >>> sues you and the HOA over it, is it going to be worth your time and >>> investment? >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >>> >>> I am getting some traction with developers for my fiber. They want me >>> to come in, they will put the subscription to my service as part of the HOA >>> fees. They will not let others in the ditch. All for 10% of the gross. >>> So I get 100% take rate. I am not unhappy with the deal. But I am >>> wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty. Anyone else done one of >>> these deals? >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
