You do realize HOA members in plural is known as a Karen?



Assuming you do the deal make sure you don’t put things in the contract that 
will get it thrown out under an FCC complaint.   A few bucks on a FCC 
knowledgable lawyer to review the agreement it is probably worth the money 
spent.  

Mark


> On Oct 6, 2020, at 10:06 AM, Chuck McCown via AF <af@af.afmug.com> wrote:
> 
> But it is free!  Comes with HOA dues.  Such a deal.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic.  
>> 
>> You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody will buy anything 
>> else when they're already forced to pay you whether they like it or not.  
>> They'd have to actively hate you before they'll even consider something 
>> else.  You'd have to steal their birthdays before they consider another 
>> option, and you'd have to violate their daughters before they're willing to 
>> pay what the installation of the other option will actually cost.
>> 
>> .....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course.  Competitors will 
>> cry foul because you can make money and they can't, but that doesn't mean 
>> they wouldn't do the same thing if they could.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>  
>>> We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service included in HOA fees.  
>>> They can have any service provider they want.
>>> But the service provider will have to do an overbuild into a saturated 
>>> area.  I would bet they will not do it. 
>>>  
>>> From: Mark Radabaugh <>
>>> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM
>>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <>
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal
>>>  
>>> https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/
>>>  
>>> <https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/>
>>> https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566 
>>> <https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566>
>>> FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February 
>>> ...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts 
>>> <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjak-670p7sAhUVHM0KHcR5D74QFjACegQIBxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hoalawblog.com%2Ffcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts%2F&usg=AOvVaw1IWC6vbyFt33Un5wLgPWSa>
>>>  
>>> Pay your money and take your chances
>>>  
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com <>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> Lots of companies doing these deals.  MDU, subdivisions.  What would be 
>>>> illegal about it?  The homeowners are free to go after any service they 
>>>> want, but they are locked into my service.  This has been litigated at the 
>>>> CATV level years ago and was found legal. 
>>>>  
>>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net <>> wrote:
>>>> I think you are going to find that arrangement is highly illegal from an 
>>>> FCC standpoint.   When the deal gets blown out by the next company that 
>>>> sues you and the HOA over it, is it going to be worth your time and 
>>>> investment?
>>>>  
>>>> Mark
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com <> wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>> I am getting some traction with developers for my fiber.  They want me to 
>>>>> come in, they will put the subscription to my service as part of the HOA 
>>>>> fees.  They will not let others in the ditch.  All for 10% of the gross.  
>>>>> So I get 100% take rate.  I am not unhappy with the deal.  But I am 
>>>>> wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty.  Anyone else done one of 
>>>>> these deals?
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com <>
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>>>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com <>
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>>>> -- 
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com <>
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>>> 
>>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to