You cannot sign away otard. otard trumps HOA agreements. Simple form to get a letter from the fcc saying fu to HOA after you send a registered letter to the HOA with the otard rules.

On 10/06/2020 10:58 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
is that a real conspiracy?

My wife had a friend over the other day, first time I ever met a real Q believer. weird shit. is Q not the same as Qanon? cause Qanon I always thought was just some guy that posted vague stuff and was supposedly in the administration. Q people think the rich eat babies and some lady who just had a miscarriage, cristy tegan or something, uses the code pizza, for little girls and always instagrams about pizza. weird shit

I think HOAs operate on different rules, since its a "voluntary" entry into them. Ive never looked too deep into it cause id never be in one, id put an air hose up my back first. but the contracts must give up a great deal of private property rights including waiving otard stuff

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com <mailto:i...@avantwireless.com>> wrote:

    Google uses low frequency brain stimulation..  Whenever you use
    their browser and the volume isn't turned off.

    On 10/6/20 7:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:

    Messaging is king of all I suppose.

    If you were Google, people would believe that you magically give
    it away for free.  Since you're not Google they'll assume some
    kind of robbery or graft.  I don't know how Google pulls off that
    kind of public relations coup.


    On 10/6/2020 10:06 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
    But it is free!  Comes with HOA dues.  Such a deal.

    Sent from my iPhone

    On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
    <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

    

    If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic.

    You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody will
    buy anything else when they're already forced to pay you whether
    they like it or not.  They'd have to actively hate you before
    they'll even consider something else. You'd have to steal their
    birthdays before they consider another option, and you'd have to
    violate their daughters before they're willing to pay what the
    installation of the other option will actually cost.

    .....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course.
    Competitors will cry foul because you can make money and they
    can't, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't do the same thing if
    they could.


    On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
    wrote:
    We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service included in
    HOA fees.  They can have any service provider they want.
    But the service provider will have to do an overbuild into a
    saturated area.  I would bet they will not do it.
    *From:* Mark Radabaugh
    *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM
    *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal
    
https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/

    https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566
    FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February
    ...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts
    
<https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjak-670p7sAhUVHM0KHcR5D74QFjACegQIBxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hoalawblog.com%2Ffcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts%2F&usg=AOvVaw1IWC6vbyFt33Un5wLgPWSa>
    Pay your money and take your chances
    Mark

    On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
    Lots of companies doing these deals.  MDU, subdivisions.  What
    would be illegal about it?  The homeowners are free to go
    after any service they want, but they are locked into my
    service.  This has been litigated at the CATV level years ago
    and was found legal.
    On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh
    <m...@amplex.net> wrote:

        I think you are going to find that arrangement is highly
        illegal from an FCC standpoint.   When the deal gets blown
        out by the next company that sues you and the HOA over it,
        is it going to be worth your time and investment?
        Mark

        On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I am getting some traction with developers for my fiber. They want me to come in, they will put the subscription
        to my service as part of the HOA fees.  They will not let
        others in the ditch.  All for 10% of the gross.  So I get
        100% take rate. I am not unhappy with the deal.  But I am
        wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty. Anyone
        else done one of these deals?
-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



-- AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to