is that a real conspiracy? My wife had a friend over the other day, first time I ever met a real Q believer. weird shit. is Q not the same as Qanon? cause Qanon I always thought was just some guy that posted vague stuff and was supposedly in the administration. Q people think the rich eat babies and some lady who just had a miscarriage, cristy tegan or something, uses the code pizza, for little girls and always instagrams about pizza. weird shit
I think HOAs operate on different rules, since its a "voluntary" entry into them. Ive never looked too deep into it cause id never be in one, id put an air hose up my back first. but the contracts must give up a great deal of private property rights including waiving otard stuff On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: > Google uses low frequency brain stimulation.. Whenever you use their > browser and the volume isn't turned off. > > On 10/6/20 7:15 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: > > Messaging is king of all I suppose. > > If you were Google, people would believe that you magically give it away > for free. Since you're not Google they'll assume some kind of robbery or > graft. I don't know how Google pulls off that kind of public relations > coup. > > > On 10/6/2020 10:06 AM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote: > > But it is free! Comes with HOA dues. Such a deal. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> > <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic. > > You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody will buy > anything else when they're already forced to pay you whether they like it > or not. They'd have to actively hate you before they'll even consider > something else. You'd have to steal their birthdays before they consider > another option, and you'd have to violate their daughters before they're > willing to pay what the installation of the other option will actually cost. > > .....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course. Competitors will > cry foul because you can make money and they can't, but that doesn't mean > they wouldn't do the same thing if they could. > > > On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: > > > We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service included in HOA fees. > They can have any service provider they want. > But the service provider will have to do an overbuild into a saturated > area. I would bet they will not do it. > > *From:* Mark Radabaugh > *Sent:* Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal > > > https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/ > https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566 > FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February > ...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts > <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjak-670p7sAhUVHM0KHcR5D74QFjACegQIBxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hoalawblog.com%2Ffcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts%2F&usg=AOvVaw1IWC6vbyFt33Un5wLgPWSa> > > Pay your money and take your chances > > Mark > > On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > Lots of companies doing these deals. MDU, subdivisions. What would be > illegal about it? The homeowners are free to go after any service they > want, but they are locked into my service. This has been litigated at the > CATV level years ago and was found legal. > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > >> I think you are going to find that arrangement is highly illegal from an >> FCC standpoint. When the deal gets blown out by the next company that >> sues you and the HOA over it, is it going to be worth your time and >> investment? >> >> Mark >> >> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >> >> I am getting some traction with developers for my fiber. They want me to >> come in, they will put the subscription to my service as part of the HOA >> fees. They will not let others in the ditch. All for 10% of the gross. >> So I get 100% take rate. I am not unhappy with the deal. But I am >> wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty. Anyone else done one of >> these deals? >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
