But it is free! Comes with HOA dues. Such a deal. Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 6, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If I was in charge of laws, they wouldn't be so legalistic. > > You don't have exclusivity per se, but in de facto nobody will buy anything > else when they're already forced to pay you whether they like it or not. > They'd have to actively hate you before they'll even consider something else. > You'd have to steal their birthdays before they consider another option, and > you'd have to violate their daughters before they're willing to pay what the > installation of the other option will actually cost. > > .....that doesn't make it a bad deal for you, of course. Competitors will > cry foul because you can make money and they can't, but that doesn't mean > they wouldn't do the same thing if they could. > > > > On 10/5/2020 8:05 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >> >> We don’t have exclusivity, we just have a service included in HOA fees. >> They can have any service provider they want. >> But the service provider will have to do an overbuild into a saturated area. >> I would bet they will not do it. >> >> From: Mark Radabaugh >> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 5:52 PM >> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Royalty deal >> >> https://www.keglerbrown.com/publications/mdus-vs-the-fcc-exclusivity-service-agreements-with-cable-and-internet-providers/ >> https://www.nexttv.com/news/fcc-bans-exclusive-mdu-deals-296566 >> FCC Bans Exclusivity Contracts — HOA Law Blog — February >> ...www.hoalawblog.com › fcc_bans_exclusivity_contracts >> >> Pay your money and take your chances >> >> Mark >> >>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>> >>> Lots of companies doing these deals. MDU, subdivisions. What would be >>> illegal about it? The homeowners are free to go after any service they >>> want, but they are locked into my service. This has been litigated at the >>> CATV level years ago and was found legal. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:28 PM Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: >>>> I think you are going to find that arrangement is highly illegal from an >>>> FCC standpoint. When the deal gets blown out by the next company that >>>> sues you and the HOA over it, is it going to be worth your time and >>>> investment? >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> >>>>> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:20 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I am getting some traction with developers for my fiber. They want me to >>>>> come in, they will put the subscription to my service as part of the HOA >>>>> fees. They will not let others in the ditch. All for 10% of the gross. >>>>> So I get 100% take rate. I am not unhappy with the deal. But I am >>>>> wondering about agreeing to a perpetual royalty. Anyone else done one of >>>>> these deals? >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
