More than that... repeaters are mostly used with no digital processing. photograph Daniel White Co-Founder & Managing Director of Operations phone: +1 (702) 470-2770 direct:+1 (702) 470-2766
> Ken Hohhof <mailto:af...@kwisp.com> > September 1, 2020 at 09:18 > > I think he’s referring to modified gear that bypasses some of the > packet processing and associated buffering and just forwards the bits > as they come in. Kind of like a cut-through switch that starts > forwarding a frame as soon as the header is received. > > > > *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:47 AM > *To:* af@af.afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ultra low latency PTP > > > > All the licensed gear I know of is full duplex, and should have near > wire speed latency. The latency should be proportional to the link > distance. > > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > On 9/1/2020 7:36 AM, Caleb Knauer wrote: > > > > Bill Prince <mailto:part15...@gmail.com> > September 1, 2020 at 08:47 > > All the licensed gear I know of is full duplex, and should have near > wire speed latency. The latency should be proportional to the link > distance. > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 9/1/2020 7:36 AM, Caleb Knauer wrote: > > > Caleb Knauer <mailto:cknauer.li...@gmail.com> > September 1, 2020 at 08:36 > Anybody here up to date on current ultra low latency licensed PTP > gear? Like in HFT networks. Trying to round up the current players. > >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
