Bingo. SAF has their solution but somewhat limited on bandwidth. I’m sure most of it is. All I want is a ton of bandwidth and usec latency across a few hundred miles. And a pony.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 11:19 AM Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > I think he’s referring to modified gear that bypasses some of the packet > processing and associated buffering and just forwards the bits as they come > in. Kind of like a cut-through switch that starts forwarding a frame as > soon as the header is received. > > > > *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:47 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ultra low latency PTP > > > > All the licensed gear I know of is full duplex, and should have near wire > speed latency. The latency should be proportional to the link distance. > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > > > On 9/1/2020 7:36 AM, Caleb Knauer wrote: > > Anybody here up to date on current ultra low latency licensed PTP gear? > Like in HFT networks. Trying to round up the current players. > > -- > > AF mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > >
-- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
