thats on the list when the world stops burning

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:02 PM Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:

> Do those strict bank sites support IPv6?
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <[email protected]>
> *Sent: *Thursday, August 6, 2020 3:50:40 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>
> We have slowly been deploying all our new IP space to eliminate NAT. Bank
> websites have been getting really strict about NAT IPs anymore
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:40 PM Mark Radabaugh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Same as Steve, though we don’t have NAT customers so we can identify all
>> of them.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On Aug 6, 2020, at 4:12 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> we use powercode. The dmca notices are forwarded to the powercode ticket
>> system from our abuse email. If the listed IP is not a NAT IP we assign the
>> ticket as viewable to the customer so its tied to their account. we leave
>> it open for a week then close it if the customer chooses not to follow up.
>> If a customer has 3 or more notices in a year, we restrict their access
>> until they verify they have read it, we have rough script that says
>> basically We are required to forward this to you, we are unable to discuss
>> it as it is between them and a third party. If they need any advice we
>> recommend they contact an attorney.
>>
>> If it is a NAT IP we update and close the unassigned ticket with the same
>> words "NAT IP, UNABLE TO IDENTIFY CUSTOMER" This meets our burden of
>> responsibility and maintains record of all notices and our active attempt
>> (while minimal) to respond.
>>
>> If we get a customer who continually gets these notices, we will have an
>> administrative discussion and notify the customer of whatever our decision
>> is (hint: it will 99 percent of the time be to do nothing other than repeat
>> the script)
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 2:39 PM TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> What is everyone else doing for these dmca notices?
>>>
>>> this whole thing is a s*** situation because they will not pay to
>>> process the requests but if you don't process the requests you lose your
>>> safe harbor status and then become liable.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020, 12:22 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> this is settled law, if you get the fine, you will pay it or close your
>>>> doors. its pretty simple
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 7:45 PM Matt Hoppes <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sure. But I kick them off - they go to someone else, then they go to
>>>>> someone else.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you come to me with a legitimate request and pay reasonable
>>>>> research fees sure we will take care if it, but we aren’t a charity.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2020, at 8:25 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>> They hope that loss of safe harbor under DMCA and headlines about $1
>>>>> billion jury awards will scare ISPs into kicking pirates off their 
>>>>> networks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/19/21030812/cox-communications-record-labels-lawsuit-appeal-1-billion-piracy-isp-charter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (and that was about songs, not videos)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 1, 2020 7:02 PM
>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like a job for Wispa.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2020, at 4:37 PM, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>> Law enforcement pays as well. Lookup the rates the big boys charge the
>>>>> police for these requests. They have pricing tables just like every other
>>>>> product they sell..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020, 1:55 PM Matt Hoppes <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m not a fan. But unless it’s law enforcement you need to pay for
>>>>> administrative time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>> Supposedly IP Echelon has a reputation for sending bogus claims, or
>>>>> not doing the due diligence required by the DMCA.  Although in some of
>>>>> those cases, they claimed it was a scam impersonating them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://torrentfreak.com/isp-wants-us-marshals-to-help-serve-piracy-tracking-outfit-180528/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *[email protected]
>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 1, 2020 2:39 PM
>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was always very cooperative.  Not a fan of IP infringement.  But
>>>>> yeah, I let the customer know they had to fix the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Darin Steffl
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 1, 2020 1:32 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>>
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Give it up Matt!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You know they won't pay so just ignore their emails.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020, 1:16 PM Matt Hoppes <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly. We won’t provide details without a court order. And without
>>>>> payment we aren’t going to research anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Aug 1, 2020, at 1:59 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > So do I understand correctly they are sending you DMCA complaints
>>>>> and you
>>>>> > are sending them bills for researching the supposedly infringing
>>>>> customer
>>>>> > and they don't pay but they send more complaints?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > This seems like Tom Hanks having a "conversation" with "Wilson" in
>>>>> the movie
>>>>> > Castaway.  Did you actually expect them to pay?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > If we receive a notice of claimed infringement, we try to make a
>>>>> judgement
>>>>> > whether it is legit or bogus, and either throw it away or contact the
>>>>> > customer accordingly.  But we NEVER contact the sender of the
>>>>> notice, we
>>>>> > never forward threats or demands for payment, and we don't provide
>>>>> > information about customers without a court order.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
>>>>> > Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 12:17 PM
>>>>> > To: [email protected]
>>>>> > Subject: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>>>>> >
>>>>> > IP Echelon continues to send us requests for information and
>>>>> research even
>>>>> > as their account remains delinquent with us.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We have contacted them multiple times requesting payment but they
>>>>> have not
>>>>> > responded and continue to send requests for research.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Does anyone have a good contact at IP Echelon related to billing
>>>>> matters?
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > AF mailing list
>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > AF mailing list
>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to