Same as Steve, though we don’t have NAT customers so we can identify all of 
them.

Mark

> On Aug 6, 2020, at 4:12 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> we use powercode. The dmca notices are forwarded to the powercode ticket 
> system from our abuse email. If the listed IP is not a NAT IP we assign the 
> ticket as viewable to the customer so its tied to their account. we leave it 
> open for a week then close it if the customer chooses not to follow up. If a 
> customer has 3 or more notices in a year, we restrict their access until they 
> verify they have read it, we have rough script that says basically We are 
> required to forward this to you, we are unable to discuss it as it is between 
> them and a third party. If they need any advice we recommend they contact an 
> attorney.
> 
> If it is a NAT IP we update and close the unassigned ticket with the same 
> words "NAT IP, UNABLE TO IDENTIFY CUSTOMER" This meets our burden of 
> responsibility and maintains record of all notices and our active attempt 
> (while minimal) to respond.
> 
> If we get a customer who continually gets these notices, we will have an 
> administrative discussion and notify the customer of whatever our decision is 
> (hint: it will 99 percent of the time be to do nothing other than repeat the 
> script)
> 
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 2:39 PM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com 
> <mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote:
> What is everyone else doing for these dmca notices?
> 
> this whole thing is a s*** situation because they will not pay to process the 
> requests but if you don't process the requests you lose your safe harbor 
> status and then become liable. 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020, 12:22 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> this is settled law, if you get the fine, you will pay it or close your 
> doors. its pretty simple
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 7:45 PM Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net 
> <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
> Sure. But I kick them off - they go to someone else, then they go to someone 
> else. 
> 
> If you come to me with a legitimate request and pay reasonable research fees 
> sure we will take care if it, but we aren’t a charity. 
> 
>> On Aug 1, 2020, at 8:25 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com 
>> <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> They hope that loss of safe harbor under DMCA and headlines about $1 billion 
>> jury awards will scare ISPs into kicking pirates off their networks.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/19/21030812/cox-communications-record-labels-lawsuit-appeal-1-billion-piracy-isp-charter
>>  
>> <https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/19/21030812/cox-communications-record-labels-lawsuit-appeal-1-billion-piracy-isp-charter>
>>  
>> 
>> (and that was about songs, not videos)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On 
>> Behalf Of Chuck McCown
>> Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 7:02 PM
>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com 
>> <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Sounds like a job for Wispa.  
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 1, 2020, at 4:37 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com 
>> <mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Law enforcement pays as well. Lookup the rates the big boys charge the 
>> police for these requests. They have pricing tables just like every other 
>> product they sell..
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020, 1:55 PM Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net 
>> <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> I’m not a fan. But unless it’s law enforcement you need to pay for 
>> administrative time. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 1, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com 
>> <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Supposedly IP Echelon has a reputation for sending bogus claims, or not 
>> doing the due diligence required by the DMCA.  Although in some of those 
>> cases, they claimed it was a scam impersonating them.
>> 
>> https://torrentfreak.com/isp-wants-us-marshals-to-help-serve-piracy-tracking-outfit-180528/
>>  
>> <https://torrentfreak.com/isp-wants-us-marshals-to-help-serve-piracy-tracking-outfit-180528/>
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On 
>> Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 2:39 PM
>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com 
>> <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I was always very cooperative.  Not a fan of IP infringement.  But yeah, I 
>> let the customer know they had to fix the problem. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Darin Steffl
>> 
>> Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 1:32 PM
>> 
>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Give it up Matt!!
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> You know they won't pay so just ignore their emails.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020, 1:16 PM Matt Hoppes <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net 
>> <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> Exactly. We won’t provide details without a court order. And without payment 
>> we aren’t going to research anything. 
>> 
>> > On Aug 1, 2020, at 1:59 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com 
>> > <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > So do I understand correctly they are sending you DMCA complaints and you
>> > are sending them bills for researching the supposedly infringing customer
>> > and they don't pay but they send more complaints?
>> > 
>> > This seems like Tom Hanks having a "conversation" with "Wilson" in the 
>> > movie
>> > Castaway.  Did you actually expect them to pay?
>> > 
>> > If we receive a notice of claimed infringement, we try to make a judgement
>> > whether it is legit or bogus, and either throw it away or contact the
>> > customer accordingly.  But we NEVER contact the sender of the notice, we
>> > never forward threats or demands for payment, and we don't provide
>> > information about customers without a court order.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On 
>> > Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
>> > Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 12:17 PM
>> > To: af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>
>> > Subject: [AFMUG] IP Echelon Delinquent
>> > 
>> > IP Echelon continues to send us requests for information and research even
>> > as their account remains delinquent with us.
>> > 
>> > We have contacted them multiple times requesting payment but they have not
>> > responded and continue to send requests for research. 
>> > 
>> > Does anyone have a good contact at IP Echelon related to billing matters?
>> > -- 
>> > AF mailing list
>> > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > AF mailing list
>> > AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> > <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>> 
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
>> -- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>-- 
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com 
> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com>
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to