Alex Jones is amazing. Hes probably the dumbest man on the planet and is
able to get millions of people to follow him even though hes been
deplatformed everywhere.  I hate those punchanazi guys, because half the
people they punch arent nazis, but i could support the punch alex jones
crowd

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:02 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

> So it took 6 weeks for us to talk about letting granny die.  And
> apparently to start planning cannibalism:
>
>
> https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/g5xzej/increasingly-desperate-alex-jones-says-he-will-kill-and-eat-his-neighbors
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 5, 2020 12:10 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Is this good?
>
>
>
> At some point, humans are going to have to accept the fact the mother
> nature will always win. Its not PC, but fact of the matter is we keep
> people alive that otherwise wouldnt have been in the gene pool, and then
> they breed. Eugenics in its basic form is correct. We dont simply have more
> diabetics because we eat like garbage, we have more diabetics because
> diabetics dont die like mother nature intended and then they breed and then
> eat like garbage.
>
> It could be that this virus kills those with comorbidity by design,
> whether by natures selection or by some scientists hand, at this point it
> doesnt really matter, its like buying a toilet after you already pooped on
> the floor.
>
>
>
> also, I have a sore throat, I had a good run guys, thanks for all the good
> times
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:00 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> It seems to me, that what really matters is how many deaths there have
> been in excess of what the average was for the same period in previous
> years (yes, I know that's what they're talking about in the NYT article,
> but I'm too lazy to read it all and see how much detail they go into). We
> can argue all day about whether somebody that died of a heart attack died
> because they had covid19 or whether they just had an unrelated heart attack
> and just happened to have a mild case of covid, and whether they should be
> counted, but in the end, it doesn't really matter. If say, an average of
> 10,000 people died in X state in April for the past 5 years, and this year
> 15,000 died, then we can pretty safely blame 5,000 of those deaths on
> covid. It doesn't really matter if 6,000 people actually died of covid, but
> 1000 of them would've died of flu anyway, and it just happened to be covid
> that finished them off instead, or if 500 got so sick of sitting in front
> of the tv that they jumped off a bridge and were never infected.
>
>
>
> I don't think we'll ever have particularly accurate numbers of how many
> people directly died of the infection (other than maybe in Utah), but in a
> few months we should have pretty accurate numbers of how many excess deaths
> there were.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:22 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
> Those who suspect an “agenda” will immediately dispute these graphs
> because the source is NYT which they will perceive as biased.  But if you
> read the article, they go out of their way to point out possible errors in
> the data, as well as other influences like overloaded healthcare system led
> to people dying of other causes, but also less deaths due to traffic and
> violence.  And the data as Bill says is from other sources, the paper
> didn’t make them up to suit a political agenda or bias.
>
>
>
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/28/us/coronavirus-death-toll-total.html
>
>
>
> In other countries like Italy, no doubt the deaths were undercounted
> because the system was overwhelmed.  Even in NYC, the morgues and
> crematories are overloaded, they are stuffing bodies in refrigerated semis,
> you can’t possibly claim these are just the normal deaths being mislabeled
> as Covid related to suit an agenda.  Then you have all the prison and
> nursing home deaths.  OK, sure, elderly people croak all the time, it’s a
> hoax.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:02 AM
> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Is this good?
>
>
>
> The numbers posted on various web sites are neither government sourced or
> corporate sourced. Hospitals, clinics, and morgues are supplying the
> numbers. There is a level of uncertainty because of different criteria.
> That is true for the US cases, but probably not for other countries. For
> example, the numbers coming from China (and several other countries) are by
> design government based. But to brush them all off as "government or
> corporations" is being naive at least.
>
> I would not say that "most" patients have pre-existing conditions. Maybe a
> high percentage, but it does not explain why such a large number of
> otherwise healthy people are being infected the way they are. At some
> point, we will figure out that there is a genetic or environmental factor
> that we just do not understand yet.
>
> I (for one) do not believe the numbers are 100% accurate, but I also do
> not believe the numbers are 100% fictitious either. Where you cut off is
> probably a personal thing.
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
> On 5/5/2020 6:55 AM, Steven Kenney wrote:
>
> You guys work with statistics much?  You think the numbers are accurate?
> At what point have you ever seen government or corporations represent 100%
> accurate numbers?
>
>
>
> I'll let you do your own homework.  But I've seen hundreds of reports from
> all over the place of deaths of natural causes being classified as covid
> deaths.  Since most patients have existing conditions and many were already
> dying and died of those conditions (heart attack, cancer etc)  are being
> attributed to covid.  Some people have estimated that upward of 20%
> misrepresented.  So as long as there is 1 case that is questionable - the
> statistics are not accurate.
>
>
>
> --
> Steven Kenney
> Network Operations Manager
> WaveDirect Telecommunications
> http://www.wavedirect.net
> (519)737-WAVE (9283)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> <part15...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"af" <af@af.afmug.com> <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Sent: *Monday, May 4, 2020 2:04:16 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT Is this good?
>
>
>
> The numbers are not "completely" false, but it's the best we can do when
> we don't actually test all the suspected infections. It also (probably)
> missed a whole lot of the early deaths, as they were miss-classified. If
> you think under-ground near-do-wells are planted in all the hospitals
> around the country and are coordinating false numbers on all the rest of
> us, then I have a tin hat that might fit real well.
>
>
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
> On 5/4/2020 10:48 AM, Steven Kenney wrote:
>
> Numbers are completely false.  Even with that taken into regard it still
> is just as lethal as the regular flu.  While it is way more harsh on people
> if they get it, most people have underlying conditions, or didn't know they
> had them, or didn't take it serious when they got it.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately politicians never waste a crisis to further their agenda.
>
>
>
> --
> Steven Kenney
> Network Operations Manager
> WaveDirect Telecommunications
> http://www.wavedirect.net
> (519)737-WAVE (9283)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"chuck" <ch...@wbmfg.com> <ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *To: *"af" <af@af.afmug.com> <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Sent: *Monday, May 4, 2020 12:30:08 PM
> *Subject: *[AFMUG] OT Is this good?
>
>
>
> [image: image]
>
>
>
> Every time I get my hopes up this curve breaks my heart...  Let’s hope we
> are on the tail of a normal curve.
>
> 6 days in a row decline.  But it has done this cycle 3 times before with a
> huge spike after.
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to