To clarify that, not getting my customers to hit my servers, I'm talk8ng
about getting other providers customers to hit my servers

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 8:45 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm curious, did you happen to try different servers from speedtest.net?
>
> I've been seeing a couple odd things about the automatic selection lately.
>
> I don't know anything about hosting the servers, but is there a mechanism
> similar to SEO that people can implement to get specific target users
> hitting their servers by default?
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 8:20 PM Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote:
>
>> You can say and publish 'Up-to' all you want.  All the customer hears is
>> 'guaranteed on my test, no matter what else I'm doing'
>>
>> What I really want is a device that would connect up to the customers
>> electric mains, so they can test that they're really getting their 200A
>> electric service multiple times a day.  Or to test their water service
>> delivery, randomly, hopefully while they're in the shower.
>>
>> On 1/28/2020 8:08 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>>
>> If there's no actual issue besides a test showing "I don't get what I pay
>> for", refer them to the up-to explanation for residential service. It
>> should be in everyone's TOS and list the 50+ variables of why a speedtest
>> won't always be perfect or accurate.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 8:00 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You can't win.
>>>
>>> I had to tell one customer we would only troubleshoot speedtest.net or
>>> fast.com results, he was using some automatic speedtest and then
>>> reviewing the report and complaining he wasn't getting what he was paying
>>> for (our traffic graphs and preseem graphs say otherwise).  He was using
>>> something like testmy.net.
>>>
>>> This is a new thing, I'm waiting for speedtests that automatically
>>> complain to the ISP and demand a refund.  Even if everything works fine
>>> including streaming.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:37 PM
>>> To: af@af.afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WIFI and 4mb Speedtest.net
>>>
>>> On 1/28/20 17:24, Josh Baird wrote:
>>> > That's great and all, but most users will go to speedtest.net
>>> > <http://speedtest.net> by default.  This is why you should consider
>>> > running your own Ookla server.
>>>
>>>
>>> We dealt with that by having a policy of not supporting speedtest.net
>>> results, and direct them to the test we will support.
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to