Exactly, you have to cap satellite based wireless / mobile wireless - at
least if you want to keep the available bandwidth per user at a respectable
level. Streaming video will burn through bandwidth caps in a hurry, and
anymore that is basically the entirety of the reason for a home internet
connection.

On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> Think about how many residential customers no longer have satellite TV.
> They don’t like antennas and they like the semi al carte that streaming
> provides.  With 8K tvs and more content daily the streaming BW is just
> going to go up and up and up.
>
> I think when fiber is compared to any wireless technology it will be the
> best value.  The wireless providers are all going to have some kind of
> limit or cap on quantity.  They cannot compete with a 1 GIG unlimited fiber
> connection for $50-$70  I seriously doubt Musk’s satellite will be able to
> compete with that.   Or any so-called 5G provider.
>
> *From:* Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:24 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] The Future
>
> To qualify that a bit, I'm referring to residential users. There may be
> niche markets like HFT that will have benefits when using it.
>
> On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, Jason McKemie <j.mckemie@veloxinetbroadband.
> com> wrote:
>
>> The difference being that this is a side project for one of the main
>> businesses, not their primary purpose. At best I don't think this is going
>> to be anything besides a better alternative to other satellite internet
>> options.
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Guys, lots of misinformation here.
>>>
>>> They are NO plans nor hints of integrating Starlink antennas into Tesla
>>> cars. It may happen but no one has hinted of this happening. All Tesla's
>>> have 3G or 4G modems already built-in to them along with WiFi. Updates are
>>> sent via WiFi first and after the fleet has received the updates, they
>>> eventually push it to cars via cellular data that haven't updated via WiFi.
>>>
>>> Regarding B2B backhaul, I don't believe you'll see this as an option
>>> anytime soon for WISP's or other ISP's. They're targeting residential and
>>> small businesses as well as government contracts. The cost if they did
>>> offer B2B backhaul services would likely be higher than fiber to your
>>> network. Please stop thinking this will happen as I bet it will not.
>>>
>>> They may offer a self install option but they'll also have a contractor
>>> to perform most installs for a cost is my guess. Maybe they'll send a self
>>> install kit for X price and if you can't get it working, they'll schedule a
>>> contract install for XX price.
>>>
>>> I'll also say that you should not doubt Elon's passion to achieve great
>>> things. I have a Tesla and it's a work of art and by far the best vehicle
>>> I've ever driven. 99% of people who have driven one also think this. Tesla
>>> is succeeding, SpaceX is on it's way there, The Boring Company is half done
>>> with their Vegas tunnel, and Starlink will likely be a viable competitor
>>> for us.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:48 PM Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you link that? What exactly were they testing?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:36 PM Robert Andrews <i...@avantwireless.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Somehow they passed a first review from US DOD...   Can't be all smoke
>>>>> and mirrors in space...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/21/2020 12:18 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>>>>> > I'm still very wary of this. There seems to be a lot of
>>>>> over-promising
>>>>> > under delivering. In typical Elon fashion, no details but the world
>>>>> runs
>>>>> > with it and puts out all these data models that make it seem like
>>>>> the
>>>>> > second coming of christ. Customer CPE is a pizza box ufo <$200 and
>>>>> they
>>>>> > are starting in 2020, but there's no pictures or details. How is
>>>>> that
>>>>> > even possible? We're buying 450b at a more expensive cost and there
>>>>> > ain't no phased antenna with motors in it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Then all you read online is the cult following of spaceslax who
>>>>> takes a
>>>>> > twitter post as gospel and just keeps perpetuating the same tired
>>>>> > information.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:02 AM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com
>>>>> > <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     If the SpaceX Starlink system works at 50% of what it's hyped,
>>>>> it will
>>>>> >     become the future of rural internet. Urban is still going to be
>>>>> >     dominated (eventually) by fiber for the foreseeable future.
>>>>> Higher
>>>>> >     speed
>>>>> >     wireless will be very, very local.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     bp
>>>>> >     <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     On 1/19/2020 6:29 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>>>> >      > I don’t know why, but this evening got me thinking about
>>>>> >     broadband delivery over the past 30 years and the future of
>>>>> broadband.
>>>>> >      >
>>>>> >      > First we had nothing, then along came dial-up and that was
>>>>> >     amazing and many companies sprung up offering the service. Giants
>>>>> >     like AOL and Prodigy.
>>>>> >      >
>>>>> >      > Then DSL and Cable came along as well as wireless and dial-up
>>>>> has
>>>>> >     all but died.
>>>>> >      >
>>>>> >      > Now DSL is basically dead, cable and wireless have gone
>>>>> through
>>>>> >     several iterations and we are seeing a push to fiber.
>>>>> >      >
>>>>> >      > What’s the possibility in the next 10 years cable and wireless
>>>>> >     will be dead technologies with fiber at the fore front?
>>>>> Possibly.
>>>>> >      >
>>>>> >      > But then..... is fiber really future proof?  We are talking
>>>>> about
>>>>> >     investing hundreds of millions into fiber infrastructure, because
>>>>> >     it’s “the future”. But is it?
>>>>> >      >
>>>>> >      > So far every technology delivery mechanism to date has become
>>>>> >     obsolete in as little as 6-10 years.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     --
>>>>> >     AF mailing list
>>>>> >     AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
>>>>> >     http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Darin Steffl
>>> Minnesota WiFi
>>> www.mnwifi.com
>>> 507-634-WiFi
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
>>>
>> ------------------------------
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to