Hi,

I have never been able to post to the mailing list, I'm trying a different way 
in hope it will work (fingers crossed)

 >  - native Mac-Intel/PowerPC binary ! (but no universal binary yet)
If we have both a PowerPC and an Intel binary making a universal binary is very 
easy!
The reason why we currently have two seperate binaries is because i built 0.8b2 
for PPC
and Kurosu built a SVN version for Intel, so merging two different versions 
together would
probably not have worked. But if we build the same version(e.g. 0.8b3) for PPC 
and Intel, i can make
a universal binary with a single command on the terminal.

> It however takes a fair bit of time, so it'll probably
> won't be available at the same time as other packages.

Building dependencies takes a huge amount of time, but if you have them already 
built
it's pretty much just about doing configure and make, then add a few files, 
copy executable,
copy data, run a makefile and run dylibbundler. it's not THAT long
(though it could be improved, i agree). The real pain is the dependencies but 
you do that only once.

>  It would be best if a
> script automated this, but I hardly have time to finish this. Ping Auria
> about this subject to have her opinion.

Last time, when you built the intel package, you told me you were scripting 
compilation?
Or you never finished it?

I could make a small script to ease building packages. However, making a script 
to build all
dependencies would be a huge work and i think that would be time better spent 
on removing
libxml++ dependency, and then i could write now mac OS X instructions that 
would be much
easier. Any opinion? ì

_______________________________________________
Wormux-dev mailing list
Wormux-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev

Répondre à