hahaha - I was concerned when I saw the title coming from an active
web2py user!


On Sep 1, 12:22 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> LMAO
>
> On Aug 31, 9:00 pm, weheh <richard_gor...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > I've been using web2py for around 6 months now and I thought I'd share
> > a bunch of reasons why I think web2py is a bad thing all around.
>
> > I used to be an expert at all sorts of things in order to build my
> > websites. I developed a whole python infrastructure over a couple of
> > years that mostly enforced a MVC development structure. With it, I
> > could get a new website, like a photo gallery website, roughed-in in
> > under a week. I had a bunch of tricks up my sleeve, written in
> > javascript, css, cookies, AJAX, Apache, MySQL, html, XML, and other
> > arcane stuff. It was a steep learning curve and frustrating having to
> > learn all those different languages, but it gave me big mental muscles
> > and a big ego to go along with them. My websites were reasonbly
> > consistent looking and did a few nifty grpahics tricks to boot. They
> > stood up pretty well to lots of page hits.
>
> > Now, I only use what comes in the web2py package and my sites look way
> > more consistent, do more graphics tricks, and use a ton less code. My
> > websites never break and I rarely check in on them to see if they're
> > working. They just work. I can develop the look and feel of the site
> > before writing the database and controller code. The photo-gallery
> > site that took a week to develop ... I can now do in an afternoon.
> > Another site that took me months to develop ... I'm on the way to
> > implementing it in a couple of weeks. I have so much extra time on my
> > hand that I find myself worrying about really dumb stuff, like
> > implementing rounded corners on my boxes or getting just the right
> > shade of eggshell blue in my background. I thought I still had a valid
> > complaint that the web2py doc was thin and incomplete, but now that
> > Massimo has come out with the fantastic rev 2.0 of the doc, even that
> > gripe has been taken away from me.
>
> > Now my mental muscles are going flabby and my ego has been deflated.
> > Practically any shmoe can now make an excellent dynamic website with
> > web2py.  Web2py is a bad, bad thing.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to