+1 Regards Ben
> On 31 May 2015, at 07:02, E. Levi Allen <e.levi.al...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > On May 30, 2015 5:39 PM, "Michael MacFadden" <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> ~Michael >> >>> On May 30, 2015, at 3:01 AM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Ok, should we then proceed with release while adding a notice that >>> federation is broken atm? >>> >>>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know how to >>>> do it, not to make it perfect. >>>> >>>> A release with some bugs, given the stage of development of Wave, is >>>> potentially a *good* thing rather than a bad one, as it may provide >>>> newcomers with the incentive to help fix those bugs. >>>> >>>> Let's get a legally correct release out now, and then aim to follow it >>>> with another that has more bugs fixed. >>>> >>>> Upayavira >>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 09:36 PM, Yuri Z wrote: >>>>> Well, actually it looks like we have an issue with federation... >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that we've all voted on >>>>>> and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully) pass >> onto >>>>>> the incubator PMC for further review. >>>>>> >>>>>> Upayavira >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote: >>>>>>> A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know that I spend >>>> ages >>>>>>> figuring that out! :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Ben >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the >>>>>> documentation I >>>>>>>> was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you havnt >>>> heard >>>>>> of >>>>>>>> vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know if you >>>> think >>>>>>>> pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people not >>>> trying >>>>>> out >>>>>>>> the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my tbd's. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yuri, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this weekend to >>>> look at >>>>>> this. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that enable >>>>>>>>> federation some time when I tidied them all up a while back. >>>>>>>>> This wasn't found earlier because: >>>>>>>>> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including re-fetching >>>> all the >>>>>>>>> third-party objects >>>>>>>>> 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the old jars >>>> - so >>>>>>>>> contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary artifacts >>>> were >>>>>>>>> working fine when tested. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Things to note then: >>>>>>>>> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not be the >>>> same >>>>>>>>> as the source artifacts >>>>>>>>> 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check out and >>>> run >>>>>>>>> everything again. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We were so close... >>>>>>>>> Ali >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways, let's >>>>>> discuss >>>>>>>>>> discuss how can we handle this... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching >>>> jars/building >>>>>> - it >>>>>>>>>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error trying to >>>> start >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> server? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ali >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from existing >>>> folder. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see, what was the issue with federation? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability to start the server with federation >>>>>>>>> enabled. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to build >>>>>>>>> correctly). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES, >>>> build.properties >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Started server without federation using file backends. >>>> Tested >>>>>>>>> wave >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creation, simple editing, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Artifact naming seems good. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Was unable to start server with federation (missing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem with the >>>> whack.jar >>>>>>>>> file >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is fetched during build. This is making me wonder how >>>> it >>>>>>>>> worked >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the same error >>>>>> here, >>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you get something different when you build from the >>>> artifact >>>>>>>>> in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean folder? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ali >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source compiles and >>>> runs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we may wish to extend the vote duration, as no-one >>>>>>>>> seems >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have responded. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have just gotten around to this email in my inbox, so >>>> hope >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this this evening... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ali >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is now available for review. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here: >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > >>>>>>>>>>>> $f.sha') >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This time I included only source artifacts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reminder on what included previous release candidates: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and RC8 included: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release related fixes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bug Fixes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration tool for >>>>>>>>> deltas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migration >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based store. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of Socket.IO. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style initials avatars. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations in dev compilation and >>>>>>>>> added >>>>>>>>>>>> GWT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superdev mode. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Federation works >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - And more... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information can be found in >>>>>>>>> RELEASE-NOTES, >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact distribution >>>>>>>>> url, as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Action Required: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test the release and make it works on your environment - >>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>> least >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configurations. Please go over the source files and make >>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain anything that cannot be released under Apache >>>> Wave >>>>>>>>> due >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May 2015. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Definitely not because... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>
