idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the documentation I was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you havnt heard of vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know if you think pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people not trying out the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my tbd's.
On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > Yuri, > > Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this weekend to look at this. > > I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that enable > federation some time when I tidied them all up a while back. > This wasn't found earlier because: > 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including re-fetching all the > third-party objects > 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the old jars - so > contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary artifacts were > working fine when tested. > > Things to note then: > 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not be the same > as the source artifacts > 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check out and run > everything again. > > We were so close... > Ali > > On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways, let's discuss > > discuss how can we handle this... > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching jars/building - it > >> worked fine. I didn't check federation. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> > >>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error trying to start the > >>> server? > >>> > >>> Ali > >>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from existing folder. > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > I see, what was the issue with federation? > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > >> -1 due to the inability to start the server with federation > enabled. > >>> > >> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to build > correctly). > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Checked: > >>> > >> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs > >>> > >> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests > >>> > >> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES, build.properties > >>> > >> - Started server without federation using file backends. Tested > wave > >>> > >> creation, simple editing, etc. > >>> > >> - Artifact naming seems good. > >>> > >> - Was unable to start server with federation (missing > >>> > >> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem with the whack.jar > file > >>> > >> that is fetched during build. This is making me wonder how it > worked > >>> > >> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the same error here, > or > >>> > >> do you get something different when you build from the artifact > in a > >>> > >> clean folder? > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Ali > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >> > Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source compiles and runs. > >>> > >> > On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> >> I think we may wish to extend the vote duration, as no-one > seems > >>> to > >>> > >> >> have responded. > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> I have just gotten around to this email in my inbox, so hope to > >>> get > >>> > to > >>> > >> >> this this evening... > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> Ali > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> >> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >> >> > RC9 is now available for review. > >>> > >> >> > Artifacts can be found here: > >>> > >> >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9 > >>> > >> >> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > > >>> $f.sha') > >>> > >> >> > This time I included only source artifacts. > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > This is taken from branch > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9 > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > Reminder on what included previous release candidates: > >>> > >> >> > RC7 and RC8 included: > >>> > >> >> > - Release related fixes. > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > RC6 included: > >>> > >> >> > - Bug Fixes > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > RC5 included: > >>> > >> >> > - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration tool for > deltas > >>> > >> >> migration > >>> > >> >> > from file to mongo based store. > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > - Added client/server profiling. > >>> > >> >> > - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of Socket.IO. > >>> > >> >> > - Added alternative - Gmail style initials avatars. > >>> > >> >> > - Decreased number of permutations in dev compilation and > added > >>> GWT > >>> > >> >> > superdev mode. > >>> > >> >> > - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1. > >>> > >> >> > - Added JDK 7 compatibility. > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > RC4 included: > >>> > >> >> > - More licensing fixes > >>> > >> >> > - Federation works > >>> > >> >> > - New and updated translations > >>> > >> >> > - And more... > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > A summary of useful information can be found in > RELEASE-NOTES, > >>> and > >>> > a > >>> > >> list > >>> > >> >> > of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact distribution > url, as > >>> > >> well as > >>> > >> >> > being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?) > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > Action Required: > >>> > >> >> > Test the release and make it works on your environment - at > >>> least > >>> > >> >> standard > >>> > >> >> > configurations. Please go over the source files and make sure > >>> they > >>> > >> don't > >>> > >> >> > contain anything that cannot be released under Apache Wave > due > >>> to > >>> > >> legal > >>> > >> >> > issues. > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May 2015. > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > [ ] +1 Release it! > >>> > >> >> > [ ] +0 OK, but... > >>> > >> >> > [ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix.... > >>> > >> >> > [ ] -1 Definitely not because... > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > Thanks > >>> > >> >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> >
