after the release did we want to remove the excess stuff from the repository, then focus on your sbt refactoring
On 27 June 2015 at 21:43, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have a dependence on same outdated jar - whack.jar I think. I guess we > need to proceed with release with stating that federation isn't working. I > ll create a new release version with this note. > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:21 AM Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yuri what ended up happening with the federation bug > > > > On 1 June 2015 at 00:03, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > If its not a small fix then I +1 > > > > > > On 31 May 2015 at 20:53, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > >> Yes, please do! > > >> > > >> On Sat, May 30, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > > >> > Ok, should we then proceed with release while adding a notice that > > >> > federation is broken atm? > > >> > > > >> > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know > how > > >> to > > >> > > do it, not to make it perfect. > > >> > > > > >> > > A release with some bugs, given the stage of development of Wave, > is > > >> > > potentially a *good* thing rather than a bad one, as it may > provide > > >> > > newcomers with the incentive to help fix those bugs. > > >> > > > > >> > > Let's get a legally correct release out now, and then aim to > follow > > it > > >> > > with another that has more bugs fixed. > > >> > > > > >> > > Upayavira > > >> > > > > >> > > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 09:36 PM, Yuri Z wrote: > > >> > > > Well, actually it looks like we have an issue with federation... > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that we've all > > >> voted on > > >> > > > > and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully) > > >> pass onto > > >> > > > > the incubator PMC for further review. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Upayavira > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote: > > >> > > > > > A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know that I > > >> spend > > >> > > ages > > >> > > > > > figuring that out! :) > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards > > >> > > > > > Ben > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the > > >> > > > > documentation I > > >> > > > > > > was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you > > >> havnt > > >> > > heard > > >> > > > > of > > >> > > > > > > vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know > > if > > >> you > > >> > > think > > >> > > > > > > pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people > > not > > >> > > trying > > >> > > > > out > > >> > > > > > > the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my > > tbd's. > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> Yuri, > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this > weekend > > to > > >> > > look at > > >> > > > > this. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that > > >> enable > > >> > > > > > >> federation some time when I tidied them all up a while > > back. > > >> > > > > > >> This wasn't found earlier because: > > >> > > > > > >> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including > > >> re-fetching > > >> > > all the > > >> > > > > > >> third-party objects > > >> > > > > > >> 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the > old > > >> jars > > >> > > - so > > >> > > > > > >> contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary > > >> artifacts > > >> > > were > > >> > > > > > >> working fine when tested. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> Things to note then: > > >> > > > > > >> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not > > be > > >> the > > >> > > same > > >> > > > > > >> as the source artifacts > > >> > > > > > >> 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check > > >> out and > > >> > > run > > >> > > > > > >> everything again. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> We were so close... > > >> > > > > > >> Ali > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>> It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways, > > >> let's > > >> > > > > discuss > > >> > > > > > >>> discuss how can we handle this... > > >> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z < > > vega...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching > > >> > > jars/building > > >> > > > > - it > > >> > > > > > >>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation. > > >> > > > > > >>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown < > a...@lown.me.uk > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error > trying > > to > > >> > > start > > >> > > > > the > > >> > > > > > >>>>> server? > > >> > > > > > >>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>> Ali > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from > > >> existing > > >> > > folder. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z < > > >> vega...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I see, what was the issue with federation? > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown < > > >> a...@lown.me.uk> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability to start the server with > > >> federation > > >> > > > > > >> enabled. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to > > >> build > > >> > > > > > >> correctly). > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Checked: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES, > > >> > > build.properties > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Started server without federation using file > > >> backends. > > >> > > Tested > > >> > > > > > >> wave > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> creation, simple editing, etc. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Artifact naming seems good. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Was unable to start server with federation > (missing > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem with > > the > > >> > > whack.jar > > >> > > > > > >> file > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> that is fetched during build. This is making me > > wonder > > >> how > > >> > > it > > >> > > > > > >> worked > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the > same > > >> error > > >> > > > > here, > > >> > > > > > >> or > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> do you get something different when you build from > > the > > >> > > artifact > > >> > > > > > >> in a > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> clean folder? > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Ali > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source > > compiles > > >> and > > >> > > runs. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown < > > a...@lown.me.uk> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I think we may wish to extend the vote duration, > as > > >> no-one > > >> > > > > > >> seems > > >> > > > > > >>>>> to > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> have responded. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have just gotten around to this email in my > > inbox, > > >> so > > >> > > hope > > >> > > > > to > > >> > > > > > >>>>> get > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> to > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this this evening... > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ali > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z < > > >> vega...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is now available for review. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here: > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9 > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md > > SHA512 > > >> $f > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> $f.sha') > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This time I included only source artifacts. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9 > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Reminder on what included previous release > > >> candidates: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and RC8 included: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Release related fixes. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Bug Fixes > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration > > >> tool for > > >> > > > > > >> deltas > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> migration > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based store. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of > > >> Socket.IO. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style initials > > avatars. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations in dev > > >> compilation and > > >> > > > > > >> added > > >> > > > > > >>>>> GWT > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> superdev mode. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Federation works > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - And more... > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information can be found in > > >> > > > > > >> RELEASE-NOTES, > > >> > > > > > >>>>> and > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> a > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> list > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact > > >> distribution > > >> > > > > > >> url, as > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> well as > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?) > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Action Required: > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Test the release and make it works on your > > >> environment - > > >> > > at > > >> > > > > > >>>>> least > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> standard > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> configurations. Please go over the source files > > and > > >> make > > >> > > sure > > >> > > > > > >>>>> they > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> don't > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> contain anything that cannot be released under > > >> Apache > > >> > > Wave > > >> > > > > > >> due > > >> > > > > > >>>>> to > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> legal > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> issues. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May > > 2015. > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but... > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix.... > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Definitely not because... > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
