We have a dependence on same outdated jar - whack.jar I think. I guess we need to proceed with release with stating that federation isn't working. I ll create a new release version with this note.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:21 AM Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yuri what ended up happening with the federation bug > > On 1 June 2015 at 00:03, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If its not a small fix then I +1 > > > > On 31 May 2015 at 20:53, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> Yes, please do! > >> > >> On Sat, May 30, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > >> > Ok, should we then proceed with release while adding a notice that > >> > federation is broken atm? > >> > > >> > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> > > >> > > remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know how > >> to > >> > > do it, not to make it perfect. > >> > > > >> > > A release with some bugs, given the stage of development of Wave, is > >> > > potentially a *good* thing rather than a bad one, as it may provide > >> > > newcomers with the incentive to help fix those bugs. > >> > > > >> > > Let's get a legally correct release out now, and then aim to follow > it > >> > > with another that has more bugs fixed. > >> > > > >> > > Upayavira > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 09:36 PM, Yuri Z wrote: > >> > > > Well, actually it looks like we have an issue with federation... > >> > > > > >> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that we've all > >> voted on > >> > > > > and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully) > >> pass onto > >> > > > > the incubator PMC for further review. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Upayavira > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote: > >> > > > > > A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know that I > >> spend > >> > > ages > >> > > > > > figuring that out! :) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Regards > >> > > > > > Ben > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the > >> > > > > documentation I > >> > > > > > > was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you > >> havnt > >> > > heard > >> > > > > of > >> > > > > > > vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know > if > >> you > >> > > think > >> > > > > > > pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people > not > >> > > trying > >> > > > > out > >> > > > > > > the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my > tbd's. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Yuri, > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this weekend > to > >> > > look at > >> > > > > this. > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that > >> enable > >> > > > > > >> federation some time when I tidied them all up a while > back. > >> > > > > > >> This wasn't found earlier because: > >> > > > > > >> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including > >> re-fetching > >> > > all the > >> > > > > > >> third-party objects > >> > > > > > >> 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the old > >> jars > >> > > - so > >> > > > > > >> contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary > >> artifacts > >> > > were > >> > > > > > >> working fine when tested. > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Things to note then: > >> > > > > > >> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not > be > >> the > >> > > same > >> > > > > > >> as the source artifacts > >> > > > > > >> 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check > >> out and > >> > > run > >> > > > > > >> everything again. > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> We were so close... > >> > > > > > >> Ali > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>> It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways, > >> let's > >> > > > > discuss > >> > > > > > >>> discuss how can we handle this... > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z < > vega...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching > >> > > jars/building > >> > > > > - it > >> > > > > > >>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation. > >> > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error trying > to > >> > > start > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > >>>>> server? > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>> Ali > >> > > > > > >>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from > >> existing > >> > > folder. > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z < > >> vega...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I see, what was the issue with federation? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown < > >> a...@lown.me.uk> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability to start the server with > >> federation > >> > > > > > >> enabled. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to > >> build > >> > > > > > >> correctly). > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Checked: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES, > >> > > build.properties > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Started server without federation using file > >> backends. > >> > > Tested > >> > > > > > >> wave > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> creation, simple editing, etc. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Artifact naming seems good. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Was unable to start server with federation (missing > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem with > the > >> > > whack.jar > >> > > > > > >> file > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> that is fetched during build. This is making me > wonder > >> how > >> > > it > >> > > > > > >> worked > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the same > >> error > >> > > > > here, > >> > > > > > >> or > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> do you get something different when you build from > the > >> > > artifact > >> > > > > > >> in a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> clean folder? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Ali > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source > compiles > >> and > >> > > runs. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown < > a...@lown.me.uk> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I think we may wish to extend the vote duration, as > >> no-one > >> > > > > > >> seems > >> > > > > > >>>>> to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> have responded. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have just gotten around to this email in my > inbox, > >> so > >> > > hope > >> > > > > to > >> > > > > > >>>>> get > >> > > > > > >>>>>> to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this this evening... > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ali > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z < > >> vega...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is now available for review. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here: > >> > > > > > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md > SHA512 > >> $f > > >> > > > > > >>>>> $f.sha') > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This time I included only source artifacts. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Reminder on what included previous release > >> candidates: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and RC8 included: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Release related fixes. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Bug Fixes > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration > >> tool for > >> > > > > > >> deltas > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> migration > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based store. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of > >> Socket.IO. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style initials > avatars. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations in dev > >> compilation and > >> > > > > > >> added > >> > > > > > >>>>> GWT > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> superdev mode. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Federation works > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - And more... > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information can be found in > >> > > > > > >> RELEASE-NOTES, > >> > > > > > >>>>> and > >> > > > > > >>>>>> a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> list > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact > >> distribution > >> > > > > > >> url, as > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> well as > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?) > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Action Required: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Test the release and make it works on your > >> environment - > >> > > at > >> > > > > > >>>>> least > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> standard > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> configurations. Please go over the source files > and > >> make > >> > > sure > >> > > > > > >>>>> they > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> don't > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> contain anything that cannot be released under > >> Apache > >> > > Wave > >> > > > > > >> due > >> > > > > > >>>>> to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> legal > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> issues. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May > 2015. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but... > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix.... > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Definitely not because... > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >
