A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know that I spend ages figuring that out! :)
Regards Ben > On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the documentation I > was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you havnt heard of > vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know if you think > pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people not trying out > the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my tbd's. > >> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> >> Yuri, >> >> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this weekend to look at this. >> >> I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that enable >> federation some time when I tidied them all up a while back. >> This wasn't found earlier because: >> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including re-fetching all the >> third-party objects >> 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the old jars - so >> contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary artifacts were >> working fine when tested. >> >> Things to note then: >> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not be the same >> as the source artifacts >> 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check out and run >> everything again. >> >> We were so close... >> Ali >> >>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways, let's discuss >>> discuss how can we handle this... >>> >>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching jars/building - it >>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error trying to start the >>>>> server? >>>>> >>>>> Ali >>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from existing folder. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see, what was the issue with federation? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability to start the server with federation >> enabled. >>>>>>>> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to build >> correctly). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Checked: >>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs >>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests >>>>>>>> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES, build.properties >>>>>>>> - Started server without federation using file backends. Tested >> wave >>>>>>>> creation, simple editing, etc. >>>>>>>> - Artifact naming seems good. >>>>>>>> - Was unable to start server with federation (missing >>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem with the whack.jar >> file >>>>>>>> that is fetched during build. This is making me wonder how it >> worked >>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the same error here, >> or >>>>>>>> do you get something different when you build from the artifact >> in a >>>>>>>> clean folder? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ali >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source compiles and runs. >>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think we may wish to extend the vote duration, as no-one >> seems >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> have responded. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have just gotten around to this email in my inbox, so hope to >>>>> get >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> this this evening... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ali >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is now available for review. >>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9 >>>>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > >>>>> $f.sha') >>>>>>>>>>> This time I included only source artifacts. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Reminder on what included previous release candidates: >>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and RC8 included: >>>>>>>>>>> - Release related fixes. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included: >>>>>>>>>>> - Bug Fixes >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included: >>>>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration tool for >> deltas >>>>>>>>>> migration >>>>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based store. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling. >>>>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of Socket.IO. >>>>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style initials avatars. >>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations in dev compilation and >> added >>>>> GWT >>>>>>>>>>> superdev mode. >>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1. >>>>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included: >>>>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes >>>>>>>>>>> - Federation works >>>>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations >>>>>>>>>>> - And more... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information can be found in >> RELEASE-NOTES, >>>>> and >>>>>> a >>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact distribution >> url, as >>>>>>>> well as >>>>>>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Action Required: >>>>>>>>>>> Test the release and make it works on your environment - at >>>>> least >>>>>>>>>> standard >>>>>>>>>>> configurations. Please go over the source files and make sure >>>>> they >>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>> contain anything that cannot be released under Apache Wave >> due >>>>> to >>>>>>>> legal >>>>>>>>>>> issues. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May 2015. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it! >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but... >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but you really should fix.... >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Definitely not because... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>
