No, Harry it really does not. No more than it matters why cold fusion works. I was merely responding to a comment on this thread with my own hair-brained ideas.
Regardless of *how* it works, the principles have now decided that they must throw down the gauntlet. Scrutiny is being brought to bear from various reputable sources. I just hope we fare better than Brian Josephson with *our* heretical claims. All test equipment has been calibrated, traceable to NIST. Alternative verifications are prepared. And here come da judge(s). A 60 day clock is ticking. Watch this space. The evidence can not be sequestered. Watch this space for any advance notices. :-) Terry On Feb 1, 2008 3:03 PM, Harry Veeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/2/2008 11:30 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 2008 5:39 PM, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> A regular poster to Vo, who will remain unnamed, may > >> want to chime-in with an appropriate anecdote here, > >> about a magnetic motor being developed which shows a > >> much greater dT than what JLN has shown... or not. > > > > Odd, I just finished discussing this topic with a colleague less than > > one hour ago. There is a lot of discussion on the web these days > > about permanent magnets and work. There is no question that a > > permanent magnet can perform work; but, there is a great deal of > > discussion about whether there can be a net energy gain in any > > magnetic cycle. If indeed there is a net energy gain in any permanent > > magnetic cycle from whence does this energy come? > > Does it really matter? > I mean shouldn't we be more concerned with the _effects_ of energy > production and distribution rather than trying to balance the energy books > all the time. > > Harry > > > > > Soon, I hope to be placed in contact with Horst Stormer (1998 Nobel > > physics - fractional quantum hall effect) to discuss the defense of a > > European patent application for such a magnetic cycle. I actually > > used Hotson's first treatise as a talking point for the electron being > > capable of acting as a negative entropy pump. I am hoping that Dr. > > Stormer can provide some insight as to the physical structure of the > > electron (or all fermions for that matter). > > > > It is conjectured at this time that a net energy gain in a magnetic > > cycle may come from the angular momentum of half-integer spin > > particles. A seriously outlandish idea is that a negative energy > > photon is moved from beyond the zero energy point into our 3 space. > > However, it would explain some experimental evidence of which I am not > > presently at liberty to discuss. > > > > Terry > > > >
