On 1/2/2008 11:30 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 5:39 PM, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A regular poster to Vo, who will remain unnamed, may >> want to chime-in with an appropriate anecdote here, >> about a magnetic motor being developed which shows a >> much greater dT than what JLN has shown... or not. > > Odd, I just finished discussing this topic with a colleague less than > one hour ago. There is a lot of discussion on the web these days > about permanent magnets and work. There is no question that a > permanent magnet can perform work; but, there is a great deal of > discussion about whether there can be a net energy gain in any > magnetic cycle. If indeed there is a net energy gain in any permanent > magnetic cycle from whence does this energy come?
Does it really matter? I mean shouldn't we be more concerned with the _effects_ of energy production and distribution rather than trying to balance the energy books all the time. Harry > Soon, I hope to be placed in contact with Horst Stormer (1998 Nobel > physics - fractional quantum hall effect) to discuss the defense of a > European patent application for such a magnetic cycle. I actually > used Hotson's first treatise as a talking point for the electron being > capable of acting as a negative entropy pump. I am hoping that Dr. > Stormer can provide some insight as to the physical structure of the > electron (or all fermions for that matter). > > It is conjectured at this time that a net energy gain in a magnetic > cycle may come from the angular momentum of half-integer spin > particles. A seriously outlandish idea is that a negative energy > photon is moved from beyond the zero energy point into our 3 space. > However, it would explain some experimental evidence of which I am not > presently at liberty to discuss. > > Terry >
