Agreed, but that could be done as build time 'check'
step. Something like JSP compiler task
http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/jspc.html  
 
I think it could be easier to create than full IDE
plugin and such core service might be a very good
foundation for people willing to build IDE specific UI
layer atop of it. 

--- D&J Gredler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I mostly agree with you that current tooling gets us
> pretty far, but there's
> a lot to be said for turning the most frequent
> "runtime" errors into
> "compile-time" errors, something that often requires
> special Tapestry
> awareness.
> 
> On 8/29/06, Konstantin Ignatyev
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >
> > My point is that in case of Tapestry/Wicket there
> is
> > no need to worry much about tools, because
> existing
> > ones provide pretty good environment to work
> within.
> > Therefore focus on APIs and conventions seems very
> > reasonable to me.
> >
> >
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to