Hey, if you are that good, switch to a plain vanilla version of vi and let's see how "good" you are...
-----Original Message----- From: Konstantin Ignatyev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 8/29/2006 3:01 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: TapIDEA future, post "Time to move on" The keyword here 'think'. That is very common, but what we actually seek is not ZZZ-IDE or plugin, but features like: - code navigation; - code completion; - syntax checks and coloring; That is about it. Tool like IntelliJ pretty much takes care of all those things without any Tapestry specific plugins. DW takes care of HTML. As for expertize level: there are certain developers which are not able to produce anything good no matter which tools they have in hands and reasonable IDEs like VisualStudio which do not help much because platform API are sooooo insane and far from 'literate' programming style http://www.literateprogramming.com/ RoR hype indicate that people are willing to compromise on tools in favor of sane defaults and APIs. My point is that in case of Tapestry/Wicket there is no need to worry much about tools, because existing ones provide pretty good environment to work within. Therefore focus on APIs and conventions seems very reasonable to me. --- Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However > I know a lot of junior to middle level developers > who think they would be > more productive with a Tap IDE. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
