Konstantin, I don't agree completely with you on his one. I must say that I do my Tapestry development in Eclipse without Tapestry IDE and I'm happy. However I know a lot of junior to middle level developers who think they would be more productive with a Tap IDE. So it's not only a matter of opinion but expertise.
My .02 cent. F On 8/29/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is all matter of opinion but I would say that IDE like IntelliJ + DreamWeaver out of box provide enought features to be productive with Tapestry. Certain Tapestry specific features would be nice to have but they are not critical IMO. --- Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > Allow me to quote from Howard's blog at > http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4110180&postID=115379415681750974 > The quote goes: > "As a reminder: Rails, the biggest success story I > can name, has no tooling > at all. Tooling is no replacement for productivity." > ................. > > IDEs' I will assure you that Howard won't take into > consideration during > work on another major release. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
