Henrik, Stop dreaming. If what you're saying is valid then we should have got Spindle for Tap 4 now. The fact of the matter is Howard just didn't listen to Geoff. With Howard's current opinion on tools, I don't think he would make a tool drive his fanatic and radical design decisions.
My .02 cent. F On 8/30/06, hv @ Fashion Content <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the best thing is building on WST and Tap5, while Tap5 is developed. The amount of special tooling needed for Tap5 should be limited. Judging form Geoff's posts the main problem with Spindle for Tap4 is the large number of possible ways to configure an application. One of the goals for Tap5 is to simplify. So if we can start over on a new Spindle while Tap5 is still in its infancy, we can perhaps ensure that the simplicity is achieved from the perspective of tooling. Henrik "Hugo Palma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i en meddelelse news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Since Geoff decided to leave the Spindle project i've been thinking about > the future of TapIDEA. As many of you know, TapIDEA is built on top of > Spindle, which means "No Spindle" -> "No TapIDEA". > > There are several scenarios that can be put into account in the current > situation, and after a long consideration here are my conclusions. > > Someone else picks up Spindle where Geoff left off: > I honestly don't think this is going to happen. AFAIK Spindle was a one > man project so no one else has the know how to quickly get into gear with > the project. Some might think that that person could be me, and indeed > i've become familiar with Spindle internals during the development of > TapIDEA. But, there's the free time factor. I just wouldn't be able to > find the time to do it. > Still, if this scenario were to be become true, TapIDEA would live on. > > Spindle for T4 dies, a new project is born: > Ok, so no Spindle and no TapIDEA for T4. What about T5 ? As Geoff as > pointed out, T5 support is going to require an almost complete rewrite of > Spindle. So, in this scenario someone would implement Spindle(or create a > whole new project) for IDE support for T5, and TapIDEA would follow. I > find that this is the scenario with the most chances of becoming reality. > > Spindle and TapIDEA die for good: > Well, there's always the possibility that no one will volunteer to > continue our efforts of bringing IDE support to Tapestry. In this scenario > both Spindle and TapIDEA end their lives now. > > > The TapIDEA project will be "hibernating" until one of these(or any other) > scenarios become reality. > I guess now it's up to the community to present their ideas about this. I > hope that, together, we can give our contribution to making Tapestry IDE > support a reality. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
