Hi Quanah,
On 22/04/15 02:52, [*] Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 11:05 PM +0100 Steve Freegard
<s...@fsl.com> wrote:
Just because *you* can't find any sense in it; others might be able to.
For example:
meta __FSL_ANY_BULK ((DCC_CHECK || RAZOR2_CHECK ||
PYZOR_CHECK) && !FSL_EMPTY_BODY)
meta FSL_FREEMAIL_BULK (__FSL_ANY_BULK && FREEMAIL_FROM)
score FSL_FREEMAIL_BULK 3.0
describe FSL_FREEMAIL_BULK Mail from Freemail account that matches
bulk signature
# 1.008 1.0844 0.0000 1.000 0.75 0.00 + FSL_FREEMAIL_BULK
However - I'll readily agree with you that DCC_CHECK adding score to all
bulk mail isn't that useful, however that is what the mass-checker has
decided works best with the corpus of mail available.
Hi Steve,
What is your rule for FSL_EMPTY_BODY? Your meta looks useful.
--Quanah
Here you go - there's a few bits to it:
meta FSL_EMPTY_BODY (((__BODY_TEXT_LINE - __FSL_HAS_SUBJECT)
<= 0) && !__FSL_HAS_CAL_PART)
describe FSL_EMPTY_BODY Message has completely empty body
score FSL_EMPTY_BODY 1.0
header __FSL_HAS_SUBJECT Subject =~ /^\s*\S/m
tflags __FSL_HAS_SUBJECT multiple
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEHeader
mimeheader __FSL_HAS_CAL_PART Content-Type =~ /text\/calendar/
endif
Kind regards,
Steve.
