On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/14/2015 5:05 PM, Steve Freegard wrote:
However - I'll readily agree with you that DCC_CHECK adding score to all
bulk mail isn't that useful, however that is what the mass-checker has
decided works best with the corpus of mail available.
I am not sure DCC is masschecked, to be honest...
It's not. The 1.1 points is hardcoded:
50_scores.cf:score DCC_CHECK 0 1.1 0 1.1
It's reasonable to argue that this score should be informational only, and
that it should only be scored meaningfully in metas.
It doesn't look like masscheck is testing it at all, so sandbox rules
meta'd with it might be pointless...
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20150411-r1672844-n/DCC_CHECK
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is not the place of government to make right every tragedy and
woe that befalls every resident of the nation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Today: the 150th anniversary of Lincoln's assassination
