--On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 11:05 PM +0100 Steve Freegard <s...@fsl.com>
wrote:
On 14/04/15 19:45, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.04.2015 um 20:26 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
On 4/14/2015 2:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
DCC isn't designed to tell you if a message is spam/not-spam. It's a
*BULK* indicator. e.g. have lots of people seen this message?
that is simply not true and defeats the purpose
Yeah - but it's clear from other posting on this list that you'd argue
black is in fact actually white.
because i can't find any sense in give bulk mail just because it is bulk
mail - indepdendent of subscribed, double-optin and what not - a penalty
Just because *you* can't find any sense in it; others might be able to.
For example:
meta __FSL_ANY_BULK ((DCC_CHECK || RAZOR2_CHECK ||
PYZOR_CHECK) && !FSL_EMPTY_BODY)
meta FSL_FREEMAIL_BULK (__FSL_ANY_BULK && FREEMAIL_FROM)
score FSL_FREEMAIL_BULK 3.0
describe FSL_FREEMAIL_BULK Mail from Freemail account that matches
bulk signature
# 1.008 1.0844 0.0000 1.000 0.75 0.00 + FSL_FREEMAIL_BULK
However - I'll readily agree with you that DCC_CHECK adding score to all
bulk mail isn't that useful, however that is what the mass-checker has
decided works best with the corpus of mail available.
Hi Steve,
What is your rule for FSL_EMPTY_BODY? Your meta looks useful.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
