On 4/14/2015 5:43 PM, John Hardin wrote:
It's not. The 1.1 points is hardcoded:
50_scores.cf:score DCC_CHECK 0 1.1 0 1.1
It's reasonable to argue that this score should be informational only,
and that it should only be scored meaningfully in metas.
It doesn't look like masscheck is testing it at all, so sandbox rules
meta'd with it might be pointless...
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20150411-r1672844-n/DCC_CHECK
Vernon, do you have a recommended score for the implementation of DCC
with SA? There are concerns that bulk mail from good senders has been
hit by DCC which is completely by design.
Any thoughts appreciated!
Regards,
KAM
