Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

[Reindl Harald]

Am 15.04.2015 um 10:24 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:

Am 14.04.2015 um 20:44 schrieb Dave Pooser:

Finally I would submit that if the phrase "sometimes wrong, but never
uncertain" sounds like a description of your mailing list posts, it¹s
worth putting the effort in to change that

On 14.04.15 20:49, Reindl Harald wrote:

nobody is perfect, but if i would be uncertain i just won't say
anything - in case of DCC indeed i was wrong and so i change my
optinion about DCC to questionable in general because a legit,
double-optin newsletter, facebook notification, twitter notification
and so on don't deserve any penalty just because of it existence

This should not be a problem unless the score hits 3.9 without DCC, in
which
case the DCC is apparently lowest problem.

as already said, you can (and should) whitelist that mail within DCC

well, that don't scale if you have 1000 and more users, in no direction because it's not global maintainable nor will the users ever be able to configure and train the spamfilter at their own

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature