On 25.11.09 07:53, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > A good marketing company would *not* require a whitellist, as their mail > would be fully compliant, score low and come from an IP with a good > reputation. If spammers can tick these boxes, a paid for ESP should have > no difficulty *without* the need for a white list.
well, a marketing company sending newsletters COULD ask for whitelisting to prevent them from being rejected or tagged as spam. There are many filters in the world and many people tending to tag as spam something they have signed for. I'm not saying that companies registered in habeas do not spam. I'm saying that those who do should be reported, which could make habeas worth using. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. (R)etry, (A)bort, (C)ancer
