From: LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:08:11 -0700 On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers... We've been through this before. On my mail, habeas is a very strong indicator of spam. It does not appear in legitimate mail. I find it a little hard to believe that your spam is so much different from my spam. On my mail, not one single spam message (out of 228k total) hit HABEAS for all of 2009. The few messages (480 out of 11k) that hit HABEAS were all ham, either professional organizations/newsletters, transactions from places like Vanguard or retail stores that I have a relationship with.
I don't know who these legitimate marketers are, but I don't feel I'm missing anything. You WILL 'block' legitimate mail. However, It's your email, so you can do anything you want. If you think HABEAS is so bad just set the HABEAS scores to zero and save the network bandwidth. -jeff
